NVIDIA
GeForce 610M vs GeForce Go 6400
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce Go 6400
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 610M and GeForce Go 6400 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GeForce 610M outperforms GeForce Go 6400 by ~3% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+3%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce 610M (~27%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce 610M
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GeForce Go 6400
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL 1.x · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3029
5464
431
Graphics card ranking
Positions 162–167of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 610M
177 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
30Better
29
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
28Better
27
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26Better
25
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
26
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
42Better
33
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Power connector
Thickness
Boost clockBetter
Release date
Vulkan
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / cores
Interface
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Transistor countBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumption—
Process nodeBetter
Device class
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce 610M and GeForce Go 6400 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce 610MGeForce Go 6400
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
150 FPS
144 FPS
1080p Ultra
106 FPS
101 FPS
1440p Ultra
57 FPS
54 FPS
4K Ultra
20 FPS
20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce 610M150 FPSGeForce Go 6400144 FPSGeForce 610M106 FPSGeForce Go 6400101 FPSGeForce 610M57 FPSGeForce Go 640054 FPSGeForce 610M20 FPSGeForce Go 640020 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce 610M97 FPSGeForce Go 640093 FPSGeForce 610M83 FPSGeForce Go 640080 FPSGeForce 610M41 FPSGeForce Go 640039 FPSGeForce 610M14 FPSGeForce Go 640013 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce 610M122 FPSGeForce Go 6400117 FPSGeForce 610M79 FPSGeForce Go 640076 FPSGeForce 610M51 FPSGeForce Go 640049 FPSGeForce 610M30 FPSGeForce Go 640029 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce 610M79 FPSGeForce Go 640076 FPSGeForce 610M66 FPSGeForce Go 640063 FPSGeForce 610M37 FPSGeForce Go 640035 FPSGeForce 610M14 FPSGeForce Go 640013 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10030293%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100302231%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100342147%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100431191%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100361677%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100351864%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100342147%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100371490%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100342147%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.09.3
Vulkan1.2Not supported
OpenGL4.62.0
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1CUDA / OpenCL 1.x
Architecture and release
ArchitectureKepler / FermiCurie
Process node40 nmBetter110 nm
Release date20112006
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count292 millionBetter75 million
Die size79 mm²Better110 mm²
Shader units / cores48Not publicly specified
Base clock475 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock475 MHzBetter400 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
LengthOEM dependentOEM dependent
ThicknessIGPOEM dependent
Recommended PSUOEM dependentOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentOEM dependent
Max monitorsOEM dependentOEM dependent
Max resolutionOEM dependentOEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM1 GB DDR3Better0.032 GB DDR
Memory typeGDDR5 / DDR3DDR / DDR2
Memory bus64 bit64 bit
TFLOPS0.091Not published (legacy architecture)
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 66
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce 610M or GeForce Go 6400?+
GeForce 610M has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce Go 6400 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 610M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 610M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce 610M offers more overall performance, while GeForce 610M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 610M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce Go 6400 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce 610M leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce 610M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce 610M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 610M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 610M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce 610M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.