NVIDIA
GeForce 710M vs Intel Arc 140V
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Intel Arc 140V
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 710M and Intel Arc 140V across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Intel Arc 140V outperforms GeForce 710M by ~27% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+27%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce 710M (~5%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce 710M
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Intel Arc 140V
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
IntelPerformance
Price / performance
3038
5465
Graphics card ranking
Positions 118–123of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc 140V
85 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
30
38Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
28
34Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
31Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
33
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
42Better
40
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Release date
Vulkan
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / cores
Interface
Die size
Memory cache
Recommended PSU
Length
Transistor count
Power connector
Thickness
Clock speed—
Base clock
Boost clock
VRAM
Memory frequency—
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth—
Power consumption—
Process node—
Device class
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce 710M and Intel Arc 140V across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce 710MIntel Arc 140V
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
152 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
107 FPS
111 FPS
1440p Ultra
57 FPS
86 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
43 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce 710M152 FPSIntel Arc 140V157 FPSGeForce 710M107 FPSIntel Arc 140V111 FPSGeForce 710M57 FPSIntel Arc 140V86 FPSGeForce 710M21 FPSIntel Arc 140V43 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce 710M98 FPSIntel Arc 140V102 FPSGeForce 710M84 FPSIntel Arc 140V88 FPSGeForce 710M41 FPSIntel Arc 140V62 FPSGeForce 710M14 FPSIntel Arc 140V29 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce 710M124 FPSIntel Arc 140V128 FPSGeForce 710M80 FPSIntel Arc 140V83 FPSGeForce 710M51 FPSIntel Arc 140V77 FPSGeForce 710M30 FPSIntel Arc 140V63 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce 710M80 FPSIntel Arc 140V83 FPSGeForce 710M67 FPSIntel Arc 140V69 FPSGeForce 710M37 FPSIntel Arc 140V56 FPSGeForce 710M14 FPSIntel Arc 140V29 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100303824%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100313820%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100343811%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100430200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10036385%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10035388%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100343811%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10037383%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100343811%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.012.2
Vulkan1.21.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedXeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureKepler / FermiXe2 LPG
Process node28 nm—
Release date20132024
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count585 millionNot publicly specified
Die size116 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores96Not publicly specified
Base clock775 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Boost clock775 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16OEM platform dependent
LengthOEM dependentOEM dependent
ThicknessOEM dependentOEM dependent
Recommended PSUOEM dependentOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentOEM dependent
Max monitorsOEM dependentOEM dependent
Max resolutionOEM dependentOEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM1 GB DDR3OEM configuration dependent
Memory typeGDDR5 / DDR3Shared LPDDR5X
Memory bus64 bitOEM configuration dependent
TFLOPS0.298OEM/TGP dependent
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 62
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce 710M or Intel Arc 140V?+
GeForce 710M has the higher overall gaming score, while Intel Arc 140V offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 710M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 710M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce 710M offers more overall performance, while GeForce 710M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 710M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Intel Arc 140V is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce 710M leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce 710M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce 710M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 710M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 710M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce 710M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.