NVIDIA
GeForce 710M vs Mobility Radeon X1800
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
ATI
Mobility Radeon X1800
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 710M and Mobility Radeon X1800 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GeForce 710M outperforms Mobility Radeon X1800 by ~3% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+3%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce 710M (~27%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce 710M
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Mobility Radeon X1800
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: Not supported · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
ATIPerformance
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3029
5464
4343
Graphics card ranking
Positions 164–169of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 710M
63 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
30Better
29
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
28Better
27
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26Better
25
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
26
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
42Better
33
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Release date
Vulkan
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / cores
Interface
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Recommended PSU
Length
Transistor countBetter
Power connector
Thickness
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumption—
Process nodeBetter
Device class
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce 710M and Mobility Radeon X1800 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce 710MMobility Radeon X1800
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
152 FPS
144 FPS
1080p Ultra
107 FPS
101 FPS
1440p Ultra
57 FPS
57 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce 710M152 FPSMobility Radeon X1800144 FPSGeForce 710M107 FPSMobility Radeon X1800101 FPSGeForce 710M57 FPSMobility Radeon X180057 FPSGeForce 710M21 FPSMobility Radeon X180021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce 710M98 FPSMobility Radeon X180093 FPSGeForce 710M84 FPSMobility Radeon X180080 FPSGeForce 710M41 FPSMobility Radeon X180041 FPSGeForce 710M14 FPSMobility Radeon X180014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce 710M124 FPSMobility Radeon X1800117 FPSGeForce 710M80 FPSMobility Radeon X180076 FPSGeForce 710M51 FPSMobility Radeon X180051 FPSGeForce 710M30 FPSMobility Radeon X180031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce 710M80 FPSMobility Radeon X180076 FPSGeForce 710M67 FPSMobility Radeon X180063 FPSGeForce 710M37 FPSMobility Radeon X180037 FPSGeForce 710M14 FPSMobility Radeon X180015 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10030293%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10031297%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10034333%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10043430%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10036353%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10035350%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10034333%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10037370%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10034333%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.09.3
Vulkan1.2Not supported
OpenGL4.62.1
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1Not supported
Architecture and release
ArchitectureKepler / FermiRadeon R500
Process node28 nmBetter90 nm
Release date20132006
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count585 millionBetter312 million
Die size116 mm²Better288 mm²
Shader units / cores96Not publicly specified
Base clock775 MHzBetter450 MHz
Boost clock775 MHzBetter450 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-III
LengthOEM dependentOEM dependent
ThicknessOEM dependentMXM Module
Recommended PSUOEM dependentOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentOEM dependent
Max monitorsOEM dependentOEM dependent
Max resolutionOEM dependentDepends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM1 GB DDR3Better0.25 GB GDDR3
Memory typeGDDR5 / DDR3GDDR3 / DDR2
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.298Not published (legacy architecture)
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 66
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce 710M or Mobility Radeon X1800?+
GeForce 710M has the higher overall gaming score, while Mobility Radeon X1800 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 710M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 710M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce 710M offers more overall performance, while GeForce 710M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 710M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Mobility Radeon X1800 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce 710M leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce 710M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce 710M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 710M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 710M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce 710M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.