NVIDIA
GeForce 910M vs GeForce GTX 570
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTX 570
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 910M and GTX 570 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GTX 570 outperforms GeForce 910M by ~7% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+7%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Equal catalog scores
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce 910M
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.5 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GTX 570
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.0 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3032
10049
54100
4356
Graphics card ranking
Positions 178–183of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 910M
174 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
30
32Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
28
29Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
27Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
49
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
42
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Release date
Launch price—
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Power connector
Thickness
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Transistor countBetter
Device class
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce 910M and GTX 570 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce 910MGTX 570
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
152 FPS
165 FPS
1080p Ultra
107 FPS
113 FPS
1440p Ultra
57 FPS
62 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
23 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce 910M152 FPSGTX 570165 FPSGeForce 910M107 FPSGTX 570113 FPSGeForce 910M57 FPSGTX 57062 FPSGeForce 910M21 FPSGTX 57023 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce 910M98 FPSGTX 570106 FPSGeForce 910M84 FPSGTX 57089 FPSGeForce 910M41 FPSGTX 57045 FPSGeForce 910M14 FPSGTX 57015 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce 910M124 FPSGTX 570134 FPSGeForce 910M80 FPSGTX 57084 FPSGeForce 910M51 FPSGTX 57056 FPSGeForce 910M30 FPSGTX 57034 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce 910M80 FPSGTX 57087 FPSGeForce 910M67 FPSGTX 57071 FPSGeForce 910M37 FPSGTX 57040 FPSGeForce 910M14 FPSGTX 57016 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10030326%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10031349%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100343914%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100435626%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001004968%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100364318%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100354116%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100343914%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100374520%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100343914%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.011.0
Vulkan1.2Vulkan 1.2 (driver support)
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.5OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureMaxwellFermi 2.0
Process node28 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20152010
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count1020 million3000 millionBetter
Die size87 mm²Better520 mm²
Shader units / cores384480Better
Base clock641 MHz732 MHzBetter
Boost clock641 MHz732 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2x16
LengthOEM dependent267 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent550 W
Power connectorNone6+6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentmini-HDMI 1.3a
DisplayPortOEM dependentBoard dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependent3
Max resolutionDepends on host system2560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB DDR3Better1,25 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR5 / DDR3GDDR5
Memory bus64 bit320 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.4921.405Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce 910M or GTX 570?+
GeForce 910M has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 570 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 910M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 910M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce 910M offers more overall performance, while GeForce 910M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 910M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 570 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce 910M leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce 910M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce 910M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 910M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 910M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce 910M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.