NVIDIA
GeForce 930MX vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTX 780 Ti
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 930MX and GTX 780 Ti across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GTX 780 Ti outperforms GeForce 930MX by ~27% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+27%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce 930MX (~17%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce 930MX
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GTX 780 Ti
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.5 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3038
10051
5444
4356
Graphics card ranking
Positions 184–189of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
133 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
30
38Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
28
34Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
31Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
51
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
42Better
36
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
USB Type-C
DirectX
Release date
HDMI
DisplayPort
Vulkan
Max resolution
Max monitors
Recommended PSU
Length
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Power connector
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Transistor countBetter
Thickness
Power consumptionBetter
Process node
Device class
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce 930MX and GTX 780 Ti across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce 930MXGTX 780 Ti
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
154 FPS
184 FPS
1080p Ultra
108 FPS
129 FPS
1440p Ultra
58 FPS
81 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
28 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce 930MX154 FPSGTX 780 Ti184 FPSGeForce 930MX108 FPSGTX 780 Ti129 FPSGeForce 930MX58 FPSGTX 780 Ti81 FPSGeForce 930MX21 FPSGTX 780 Ti28 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce 930MX99 FPSGTX 780 Ti118 FPSGeForce 930MX85 FPSGTX 780 Ti102 FPSGeForce 930MX42 FPSGTX 780 Ti59 FPSGeForce 930MX14 FPSGTX 780 Ti19 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce 930MX125 FPSGTX 780 Ti149 FPSGeForce 930MX81 FPSGTX 780 Ti97 FPSGeForce 930MX52 FPSGTX 780 Ti73 FPSGeForce 930MX31 FPSGTX 780 Ti42 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce 930MX81 FPSGTX 780 Ti97 FPSGeForce 930MX68 FPSGTX 780 Ti81 FPSGeForce 930MX38 FPSGTX 780 Ti53 FPSGeForce 930MX14 FPSGTX 780 Ti19 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100303824%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100334019%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100344323%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100435626%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001005165%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100364624%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100354525%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100344323%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100374826%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100344323%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.011.1
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.5
Architecture and release
ArchitectureMaxwellKepler
Process node28 nm28 nm
Release date20162013
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count1020 million7080 millionBetter
Die size77 mm²Better561 mm²
Shader units / cores3842880Better
Base clock952 MHzBetter875 MHz
Boost clock1020 MHzBetter928 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3x16
LengthOEM dependent267 mm
ThicknessMXM ModuleDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent600 W
Power connectorNone6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependent4
Max resolutionDepends on host system4096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB DDR33 GB GDDR5Better
Memory typeGDDR5 / DDR3GDDR5
Memory bus64 bit384 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.7835.345Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce 930MX or GTX 780 Ti?+
GeForce 930MX has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce 930MX offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 930MX is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 930MX is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce 930MX offers more overall performance, while GeForce 930MX offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 930MX is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce 930MX is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce 930MX leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce 930MX can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce 930MX is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 930MX is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 930MX is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce 930MX if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.