NVIDIA
GeForce 930MX vs Radeon R5 M320
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Radeon R5 M320
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 930MX and Radeon R5 M320 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GeForce 930MX outperforms Radeon R5 M320 by ~3% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+3%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce 930MX (~27%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce 930MX
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Radeon R5 M320
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3029
5464
4350
Graphics card ranking
Positions 184–189of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon R5 M320
162 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
30Better
29
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
28Better
27
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26Better
25
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
26
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
42Better
33
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
USB Type-C
DirectX
Release date
HDMI
DisplayPort
Vulkan
Max resolution
Max monitors
Recommended PSU
Length
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumption—
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Power connector
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Transistor countBetter
Thickness
Power consumption—
Process node
Device class
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce 930MX and Radeon R5 M320 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce 930MXRadeon R5 M320
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
154 FPS
147 FPS
1080p Ultra
108 FPS
103 FPS
1440p Ultra
58 FPS
55 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce 930MX154 FPSRadeon R5 M320147 FPSGeForce 930MX108 FPSRadeon R5 M320103 FPSGeForce 930MX58 FPSRadeon R5 M32055 FPSGeForce 930MX21 FPSRadeon R5 M32020 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce 930MX99 FPSRadeon R5 M32095 FPSGeForce 930MX85 FPSRadeon R5 M32082 FPSGeForce 930MX42 FPSRadeon R5 M32040 FPSGeForce 930MX14 FPSRadeon R5 M32013 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce 930MX125 FPSRadeon R5 M320120 FPSGeForce 930MX81 FPSRadeon R5 M32078 FPSGeForce 930MX52 FPSRadeon R5 M32050 FPSGeForce 930MX31 FPSRadeon R5 M32029 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce 930MX81 FPSRadeon R5 M32078 FPSGeForce 930MX68 FPSRadeon R5 M32065 FPSGeForce 930MX38 FPSRadeon R5 M32036 FPSGeForce 930MX14 FPSRadeon R5 M32014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10030293%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10033323%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10034353%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100435015%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10036385%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10035376%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10034353%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100374110%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10034353%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.011.1
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0OpenCL 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureMaxwellGCN
Process node28 nm28 nm
Release date20162015
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count1020 millionBetter690 million
Die size77 mm²56 mm²Better
Shader units / cores384Better320
Base clock952 MHzBetter780 MHz
Boost clock1020 MHzBetter855 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
LengthOEM dependentOEM dependent
ThicknessMXM ModuleIGP
Recommended PSUOEM dependentOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentOEM dependent
Max monitorsOEM dependentOEM dependent
Max resolutionDepends on host systemDepends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB DDR34 GB DDR3Better
Memory typeGDDR5 / DDR3GDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus64 bit64 bit
TFLOPS0.783Better0.547
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 66
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce 930MX or Radeon R5 M320?+
GeForce 930MX has the higher overall gaming score, while Radeon R5 M320 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 930MX is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 930MX is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce 930MX offers more overall performance, while GeForce 930MX offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 930MX is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Radeon R5 M320 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce 930MX leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce 930MX can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce 930MX is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 930MX is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 930MX is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce 930MX if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.