NVIDIA
GeForce 9400M G vs Radeon HD 6970
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
HD 6970
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9400M G and HD 6970 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GeForce 9400M G outperforms HD 6970 by ~21% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+21%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce 9400M G (~16%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce 9400M G
- Higher catalog performance index
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL 1.x · Not supported
Reasons to consider HD 6970
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
4134
10045
58100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 35–40of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 9400M G
93 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
41Better
34
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
36Better
31
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
34Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
45
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
50Better
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Release date
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Memory cache
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Memory frequency—
Memory bandwidth—
Thickness
Die sizeBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Transistor countBetter
Device class
Vulkan
Power connector
Compute API
VRAM
Memory bus
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce 9400M G and HD 6970 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce 9400M GHD 6970
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
168 FPS
173 FPS
1080p Ultra
118 FPS
118 FPS
1440p Ultra
92 FPS
64 FPS
4K Ultra
46 FPS
24 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce 9400M G168 FPSHD 6970173 FPSGeForce 9400M G118 FPSHD 6970118 FPSGeForce 9400M G92 FPSHD 697064 FPSGeForce 9400M G46 FPSHD 697024 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce 9400M G108 FPSHD 6970112 FPSGeForce 9400M G93 FPSHD 697093 FPSGeForce 9400M G67 FPSHD 697047 FPSGeForce 9400M G31 FPSHD 697016 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce 9400M G137 FPSHD 6970141 FPSGeForce 9400M G89 FPSHD 697089 FPSGeForce 9400M G83 FPSHD 697058 FPSGeForce 9400M G67 FPSHD 697035 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce 9400M G89 FPSHD 697091 FPSGeForce 9400M G74 FPSHD 697074 FPSGeForce 9400M G60 FPSHD 697042 FPSGeForce 9400M G31 FPSHD 697016 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100413419%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10036373%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10041402%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100056200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001004576%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10041447%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10041435%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10041402%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100414611%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10041402%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX10.011.0
VulkanNot supportedNot supported
OpenGL3.34.4
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APICUDA / OpenCL 1.xOpenCL 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTeslaTeraScale 3
Process node65 nm40 nmBetter
Release date20082010
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count314 million2640 millionBetter
Die size144 mm²Better389 mm²
Shader units / cores161536Better
Base clock450 MHz880 MHzBetter
Boost clock450 MHz880 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2x16
LengthOEM dependent286 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent600 W
Power connectorIntegrated laptop power6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortOEM dependentmini-DisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependent5
Max resolutionDepends on host system4096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAMOEM configuration dependent2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR3 / DDR2GDDR5
Memory busOEM configuration dependent256 bit
TFLOPS0.0352.703Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce 9400M G or HD 6970?+
GeForce 9400M G has the higher overall gaming score, while HD 6970 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 9400M G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 9400M G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce 9400M G offers more overall performance, while GeForce 9400M G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 9400M G is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
HD 6970 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce 9400M G leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce 9400M G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce 9400M G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 9400M G is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 9400M G is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce 9400M G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.