NVIDIA
GeForce 9400M G vs Radeon RX 6800
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 6800
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9400M G and RX 6800 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 6800 outperforms GeForce 9400M G by ~29% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+29%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce 9400M G (~2%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce 9400M G
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL 1.x · Not supported
Reasons to consider RX 6800
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
4153
10071
5836
Graphics card ranking
Positions 35–40of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6800
152 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
41
53Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
36
45Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
34
42Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
71
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
50Better
49
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Release date
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Memory cache
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Memory frequency—
Memory bandwidth—
Thickness
Die sizeBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Transistor countBetter
Device class
Vulkan
Power connector
Compute API
VRAM
Memory bus
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce 9400M G and RX 6800 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce 9400M GRX 6800
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
168 FPS
218 FPS
1080p Ultra
118 FPS
153 FPS
1440p Ultra
92 FPS
119 FPS
4K Ultra
46 FPS
59 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce 9400M G168 FPSRX 6800218 FPSGeForce 9400M G118 FPSRX 6800153 FPSGeForce 9400M G92 FPSRX 6800119 FPSGeForce 9400M G46 FPSRX 680059 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce 9400M G108 FPSRX 6800141 FPSGeForce 9400M G93 FPSRX 6800121 FPSGeForce 9400M G67 FPSRX 680086 FPSGeForce 9400M G31 FPSRX 680040 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce 9400M G137 FPSRX 6800177 FPSGeForce 9400M G89 FPSRX 6800115 FPSGeForce 9400M G83 FPSRX 6800107 FPSGeForce 9400M G67 FPSRX 680087 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce 9400M G89 FPSRX 6800115 FPSGeForce 9400M G74 FPSRX 680096 FPSGeForce 9400M G60 FPSRX 680077 FPSGeForce 9400M G31 FPSRX 680040 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100415326%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100366152%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100416342%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100088200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007134%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100416951%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100416748%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100416342%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100417255%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100416444%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX10.012.2
VulkanNot supported1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingNot supportedFSR
Compute APICUDA / OpenCL 1.xOpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTeslaRDNA 2.0
Process node65 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20082020
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count314 million26800 millionBetter
Die size144 mm²Better520 mm²
Shader units / cores163840Better
Base clock450 MHz1700 MHzBetter
Boost clock450 MHz2105 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4x16
LengthOEM dependent267 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent600 W
Power connectorIntegrated laptop power8+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-COEM dependentYes
Max monitorsOEM dependent4
Max resolutionDepends on host system7680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAMOEM configuration dependent16 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR3 / DDR2GDDR6
Memory busOEM configuration dependent256 bit
TFLOPS0.03516.17Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce 9400M G or RX 6800?+
GeForce 9400M G has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce 9400M G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 9400M G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 9400M G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce 9400M G offers more overall performance, while GeForce 9400M G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 9400M G is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce 9400M G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce 9400M G leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce 9400M G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce 9400M G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 9400M G is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 9400M G is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce 9400M G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.