NVIDIA
GeForce G 103M vs GeForce MX110
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce MX110
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce G 103M and GeForce MX110 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GeForce G 103M outperforms GeForce MX110 by ~1% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+1%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Equal catalog scores
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce G 103M
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GeForce MX110
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3030
100100
5454
3456
Graphics card ranking
Positions 197–202of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce MX110
149 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
30
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
28
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
42
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Release date
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Power connector
Thickness
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Vulkan
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Transistor countBetter
Device class
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce G 103M and GeForce MX110 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce G 103MGeForce MX110
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
151 FPS
153 FPS
1080p Ultra
106 FPS
108 FPS
1440p Ultra
57 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
20 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce G 103M151 FPSGeForce MX110153 FPSGeForce G 103M106 FPSGeForce MX110108 FPSGeForce G 103M57 FPSGeForce MX11058 FPSGeForce G 103M20 FPSGeForce MX11021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce G 103M97 FPSGeForce MX11099 FPSGeForce G 103M84 FPSGeForce MX11085 FPSGeForce G 103M41 FPSGeForce MX11042 FPSGeForce G 103M14 FPSGeForce MX11014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce G 103M123 FPSGeForce MX110125 FPSGeForce G 103M79 FPSGeForce MX11081 FPSGeForce G 103M51 FPSGeForce MX11052 FPSGeForce G 103M30 FPSGeForce MX11031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce G 103M79 FPSGeForce MX11081 FPSGeForce G 103M66 FPSGeForce MX11068 FPSGeForce G 103M37 FPSGeForce MX11037 FPSGeForce G 103M14 FPSGeForce MX11014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10030300%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100293416%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100313718%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100345649%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100324227%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100324022%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100313718%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100324432%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100313820%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX10.011.0
VulkanNot supported1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTeslaPascal / Turing / Ampere
Process node65 nm28 nmBetter
Release date20092017
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count210 million1020 millionBetter
Die size86 mm²77 mm²Better
Shader units / cores8256Better
Base clock640 MHz978 MHzBetter
Boost clock640 MHz1006 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
LengthOEM dependentOEM dependent
ThicknessIGPIGP
Recommended PSUOEM dependentOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentOEM dependent
Max monitorsOEM dependentOEM dependent
Max resolutionOEM dependentDepends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM0.5 GB DDR22 GB GDDR5Better
Memory typeGDDR3 / DDR3GDDR5 / GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit64 bit
TFLOPS0.0260.515Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce G 103M or GeForce MX110?+
GeForce G 103M has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce G 103M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce G 103M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce G 103M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce G 103M offers more overall performance, while GeForce G 103M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce G 103M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce G 103M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce G 103M leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce G 103M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce G 103M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce G 103M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce G 103M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce G 103M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.