NVIDIA
GeForce MX130 vs GeForce 820M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce 820M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce MX130 and GeForce 820M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GeForce MX130 outperforms GeForce 820M by ~3% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+3%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce MX130 (~2%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce MX130
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GeForce 820M
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.0 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3130
100100
5454
5643
Graphics card ranking
Positions 143–148of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce MX130
105 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
43Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Release date
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Length
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / cores
Interface
Power connector
Recommended PSU
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process node
Transistor countBetter
Thickness
Device class
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce MX130 and GeForce 820M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce MX130GeForce 820M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
155 FPS
153 FPS
1080p Ultra
109 FPS
107 FPS
1440p Ultra
58 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce MX130155 FPSGeForce 820M153 FPSGeForce MX130109 FPSGeForce 820M107 FPSGeForce MX13058 FPSGeForce 820M58 FPSGeForce MX13021 FPSGeForce 820M21 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce MX130100 FPSGeForce 820M98 FPSGeForce MX13086 FPSGeForce 820M85 FPSGeForce MX13042 FPSGeForce 820M42 FPSGeForce MX13014 FPSGeForce 820M14 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce MX130126 FPSGeForce 820M124 FPSGeForce MX13082 FPSGeForce 820M80 FPSGeForce MX13052 FPSGeForce 820M52 FPSGeForce MX13031 FPSGeForce 820M30 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce MX13082 FPSGeForce 820M80 FPSGeForce MX13068 FPSGeForce 820M67 FPSGeForce MX13038 FPSGeForce 820M37 FPSGeForce MX13014 FPSGeForce 820M14 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10031303%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100363212%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100383411%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100564326%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100423615%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100413516%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100383411%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100453720%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100383411%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.011.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePascal / Turing / AmpereKepler / Maxwell
Process node28 nm28 nm
Release date20172015
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count1020 million1270 millionBetter
Die size77 mm²Better118 mm²
Shader units / cores384384
Base clock1109 MHzBetter810 MHz
Boost clock1189 MHzBetter810 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16
LengthOEM dependentOEM dependent
ThicknessIGPMXM Module
Recommended PSUOEM dependentOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentOEM dependent
Max monitorsOEM dependentOEM dependent
Max resolutionDepends on host systemDepends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR52 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR5 / GDDR6GDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus64 bit128 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.913Better0.622
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce MX130 or GeForce 820M?+
GeForce MX130 has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce MX130 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce MX130 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce MX130 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce MX130 offers more overall performance, while GeForce MX130 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce MX130 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce MX130 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce MX130 leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce MX130 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce MX130 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce MX130 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce MX130 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce MX130 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.