NVIDIA
GeForce MX230 vs GeForce MX450
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce MX450
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce MX230 and GeForce MX450 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GeForce MX450 outperforms GeForce MX230 by ~23% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+23%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce MX230 (~8%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce MX230
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Reasons to consider GeForce MX450
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Price / performance
3138
5465
Graphics card ranking
Positions 109–114of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce MX450
65 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31
38Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
34Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
31Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
33
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
43Better
40
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Power connector
Release date
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / cores
Interface
Recommended PSU
Length
Die size
Memory cache
Clock speed—
Base clock
Boost clock
VRAM
Transistor count
Thickness
Memory frequency—
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth—
Power consumption—
Process node—
Device class
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce MX230 and GeForce MX450 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce MX230GeForce MX450
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
156 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
110 FPS
111 FPS
1440p Ultra
59 FPS
86 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
43 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce MX230156 FPSGeForce MX450157 FPSGeForce MX230110 FPSGeForce MX450111 FPSGeForce MX23059 FPSGeForce MX45086 FPSGeForce MX23021 FPSGeForce MX45043 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce MX230101 FPSGeForce MX450102 FPSGeForce MX23087 FPSGeForce MX45088 FPSGeForce MX23043 FPSGeForce MX45062 FPSGeForce MX23014 FPSGeForce MX45029 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce MX230127 FPSGeForce MX450128 FPSGeForce MX23082 FPSGeForce MX45083 FPSGeForce MX23053 FPSGeForce MX45077 FPSGeForce MX23031 FPSGeForce MX45063 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce MX23082 FPSGeForce MX45083 FPSGeForce MX23069 FPSGeForce MX45069 FPSGeForce MX23038 FPSGeForce MX45056 FPSGeForce MX23014 FPSGeForce MX45029 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100313820%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100560200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100423810%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10041388%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100453817%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.112.2
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1CUDA / OpenCL
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePascal / Turing / AmperePascal / Turing / Ampere
Process node14 nm—
Release date20192017
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count1800 millionNot publicly specified
Die size74 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores256Not publicly specified
Base clock1519 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Boost clock1531 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4OEM platform dependent
LengthOEM dependentOEM dependent
ThicknessIGPOEM dependent
Recommended PSUOEM dependentOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentOEM dependent
Max monitorsOEM dependentOEM dependent
Max resolutionDepends on host systemOEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR5OEM configuration dependent
Memory typeGDDR5 / GDDR6GDDR5 / GDDR6
Memory bus64 bitOEM configuration dependent
TFLOPS0.784OEM/TGP dependent
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 62
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce MX230 or GeForce MX450?+
GeForce MX230 has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce MX450 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce MX230 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce MX230 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce MX230 offers more overall performance, while GeForce MX230 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce MX230 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce MX450 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce MX230 leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce MX230 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce MX230 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce MX230 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce MX230 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce MX230 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.