NVIDIA
GeForce MX570 vs GeForce GTX 780M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 780M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce MX570 and GeForce GTX 780M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GeForce GTX 780M outperforms GeForce MX570 by ~3% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+3%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce MX570 (~2%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce MX570
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 780M
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.0 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3233
10090
5556
6056
Graphics card ranking
Positions 93–98of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce MX570
77 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32
33Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
30Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27
28Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
90
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
43Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Release date
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Power connector
Thickness
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Transistor countBetter
Device class
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce MX570 and GeForce GTX 780M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce MX570GeForce GTX 780M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
163 FPS
166 FPS
1080p Ultra
115 FPS
113 FPS
1440p Ultra
62 FPS
62 FPS
4K Ultra
22 FPS
23 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce MX570163 FPSGeForce GTX 780M166 FPSGeForce MX570115 FPSGeForce GTX 780M113 FPSGeForce MX57062 FPSGeForce GTX 780M62 FPSGeForce MX57022 FPSGeForce GTX 780M23 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce MX570105 FPSGeForce GTX 780M107 FPSGeForce MX57091 FPSGeForce GTX 780M90 FPSGeForce MX57045 FPSGeForce GTX 780M45 FPSGeForce MX57015 FPSGeForce GTX 780M15 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce MX570133 FPSGeForce GTX 780M135 FPSGeForce MX57086 FPSGeForce GTX 780M85 FPSGeForce MX57056 FPSGeForce GTX 780M56 FPSGeForce MX57033 FPSGeForce GTX 780M34 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce MX57086 FPSGeForce GTX 780M88 FPSGeForce MX57072 FPSGeForce GTX 780M71 FPSGeForce MX57040 FPSGeForce GTX 780M40 FPSGeForce MX57015 FPSGeForce GTX 780M16 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10032333%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10037356%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10040393%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10060567%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001009011%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10045435%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10043422%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10040393%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10048456%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10041402%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.211.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePascal / Turing / AmpereKepler / Fermi
Process node8 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20212013
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count8700 millionBetter3540 million
Die size200 mm²Better294 mm²
Shader units / cores2048Better1536
Base clock832 MHzBetter771 MHz
Boost clock1155 MHzBetter797 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
LengthOEM dependentOEM dependent
ThicknessIGPMXM Module
Recommended PSUOEM dependentOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentOEM dependent
Max monitorsOEM dependentOEM dependent
Max resolutionDepends on host systemDepends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR64 GB GDDR5Better
Memory typeGDDR5 / GDDR6GDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS4.731Better2.448
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce MX570 or GeForce GTX 780M?+
GeForce MX570 has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce GTX 780M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce MX570 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce MX570 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce MX570 offers more overall performance, while GeForce MX570 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce MX570 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce GTX 780M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce MX570 leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce MX570 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce MX570 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce MX570 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce MX570 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce MX570 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.