NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs GeForce MX230
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce MX230
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and GeForce MX230 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile outperforms GeForce MX230 by ~39% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+39%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (~21%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5 · DLSS 2
Reasons to consider GeForce MX230
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4331
100100
5954
6856
Graphics card ranking
Positions 16–21of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
68 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
43Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
37Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
35Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Release date
Upscaling
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / coresBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Interface
Power connector
Thickness
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Device class
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and GeForce MX230 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce RTX 2070 MobileGeForce MX230
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
190 FPS
156 FPS
1080p Ultra
134 FPS
110 FPS
1440p Ultra
104 FPS
59 FPS
4K Ultra
38 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile190 FPSGeForce MX230156 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile134 FPSGeForce MX230110 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile104 FPSGeForce MX23059 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile38 FPSGeForce MX23021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile123 FPSGeForce MX230101 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile106 FPSGeForce MX23087 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile75 FPSGeForce MX23043 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile26 FPSGeForce MX23014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile155 FPSGeForce MX230127 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile100 FPSGeForce MX23082 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile94 FPSGeForce MX23053 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile57 FPSGeForce MX23031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile100 FPSGeForce MX23082 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile84 FPSGeForce MX23069 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile67 FPSGeForce MX23038 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile26 FPSGeForce MX23014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100433132%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100483823%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100503827%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100685619%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100544225%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100534126%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100503827%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100574524%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100513829%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTuringPascal / Turing / Ampere
Process node12 nmBetter14 nm
Release date20192019
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count10800 millionBetter1800 million
Die size445 mm²74 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2304Better256
Base clock1215 MHz1519 MHzBetter
Boost clock1440 MHz1531 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
LengthOEM dependentOEM dependent
ThicknessMXM ModuleIGP
Recommended PSUOEM dependentOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentOEM dependent
Max monitorsOEM dependentOEM dependent
Max resolutionDepends on host systemDepends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5 / GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS6.636Better0.784
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile or GeForce MX230?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile offers more overall performance, while GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce MX230 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce MX230 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.