NVIDIA
GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon RX 6800
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 6800
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GT 1030 and RX 6800 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 6800 outperforms GT 1030 by ~66% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+66%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce GT 1030 (~6%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GT 1030
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider RX 6800
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3253
10071
10036
5688
Graphics card ranking
Positions 55–60of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6800
152 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GT 1030
Price $50.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32
53Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
45Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27
42Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
71
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
49
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speedBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
HDMI
Device class
DisplayPort
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
Power consumptionBetter
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GT 1030 and RX 6800 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GT 1030RX 6800
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
160 FPS
218 FPS
1080p Ultra
112 FPS
153 FPS
1440p Ultra
60 FPS
119 FPS
4K Ultra
22 FPS
59 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GT 1030160 FPSRX 6800218 FPSGT 1030112 FPSRX 6800153 FPSGT 103060 FPSRX 6800119 FPSGT 103022 FPSRX 680059 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GT 1030103 FPSRX 6800141 FPSGT 103089 FPSRX 6800121 FPSGT 103044 FPSRX 680086 FPSGT 103015 FPSRX 680040 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GT 1030130 FPSRX 6800177 FPSGT 103084 FPSRX 6800115 FPSGT 103054 FPSRX 6800107 FPSGT 103032 FPSRX 680087 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGT 103084 FPSRX 6800115 FPSGT 103070 FPSRX 680096 FPSGT 103039 FPSRX 680077 FPSGT 103015 FPSRX 680040 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100325349%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100386146%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100396347%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100568844%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007134%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100436946%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100416748%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100396347%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100457246%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100396449%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.112.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePascalRDNA 2.0
Process node16 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20172020
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count1800 million26800 millionBetter
Die size74 mm²Better520 mm²
Shader units / cores3843840Better
Base clock1227 MHz1700 MHzBetter
Boost clock1519 MHz2105 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x4PCIe 4x16
Length145 mmBetter267 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU200 WBetter600 W
Power connectorNone8+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoYes
Max monitors24
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR516 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS1.12716.17Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (6)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GT 1030 or RX 6800?+
GT 1030 has the higher overall gaming score, while GT 1030 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GT 1030 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GT 1030 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GT 1030 offers more overall performance, while GT 1030 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GT 1030 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GT 1030 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GT 1030 leads in combined 1440p performance. GT 1030 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GT 1030 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GT 1030 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GT 1030 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GT 1030 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.