NVIDIA
GeForce GT 130 vs Radeon 780M 8700G
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
780M 8700G
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GT 130 and 780M 8700G across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗780M 8700G outperforms GT 130 by ~28% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+28%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce GT 130 (~4%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GT 130
- Lower recorded market price
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider 780M 8700G
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
3950
10098
Graphics card ranking
Positions 220–225of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon 780M 8700G
173 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39
50Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
42Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32
40Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
48
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
57Better
55
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Power consumption—
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequency—
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth—
Interface
Power consumption—
Process nodeBetter
Die size
Transistor count
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
Vulkan
Upscaling
DisplayPort
HDMI
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GT 130 and 780M 8700G across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GT 130780M 8700G
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
195 FPS
206 FPS
1080p Ultra
137 FPS
145 FPS
1440p Ultra
77 FPS
113 FPS
4K Ultra
28 FPS
56 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GT 130195 FPS780M 8700G206 FPSGT 130137 FPS780M 8700G145 FPSGT 13077 FPS780M 8700G113 FPSGT 13028 FPS780M 8700G56 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GT 130126 FPS780M 8700G133 FPSGT 130108 FPS780M 8700G115 FPSGT 13055 FPS780M 8700G82 FPSGT 13019 FPS780M 8700G38 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GT 130158 FPS780M 8700G168 FPSGT 130103 FPS780M 8700G109 FPSGT 13069 FPS780M 8700G102 FPSGT 13041 FPS780M 8700G82 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGT 130103 FPS780M 8700G109 FPSGT 13086 FPS780M 8700G91 FPSGT 13050 FPS780M 8700G73 FPSGT 13019 FPS780M 8700G38 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100395025%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100325858%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100325044%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100130200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100275060%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100285056%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100325044%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100245070%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100315047%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX10.012.2
VulkanNot supported1.3
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingNot supportedFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTeslaNot publicly specified
Process node55 nm4 nmBetter
Release date20092023
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count314 millionNot publicly specified
Die size121 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores32Not publicly specified
Base clock500 MHz800 MHzBetter
Boost clock500 MHz2900 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16IGP
LengthVaries by boardOEM dependent
ThicknessMXM ModuleOEM dependent
Recommended PSUVaries by boardOEM dependent
Power connector6 pinIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIBoard dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitorsVaries by boardOEM dependent
Max resolutionVaries by boardOEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM512 MB DDR2- SMA
Memory typeDDR2SMA
Memory bus192 bitSystem memory interface
TFLOPS0.0968.91Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 65
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GT 130 or 780M 8700G?+
GT 130 has the higher overall gaming score, while GT 130 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GT 130 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GT 130 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GT 130 offers more overall performance, while GT 130 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GT 130 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GT 130 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GT 130 leads in combined 1440p performance. GT 130 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GT 130 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GT 130 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GT 130 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GT 130 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.