NVIDIA
GeForce GT 430 vs GeForce GTX 285
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTX 285
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GT 430 and GTX 285 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GT 430 outperforms GTX 285 by ~1% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+1%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce GT 430 (~24%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GT 430
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GTX 285
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.3 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3131
10051
100100
4343
Graphics card ranking
Positions 271–276of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GT 430
118 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
51
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
Device class
USB Type-C
DirectX
Max monitors
Max resolution
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
Vulkan
DisplayPort
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GT 430 and GTX 285 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GT 430GTX 285
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
154 FPS
156 FPS
1080p Ultra
108 FPS
109 FPS
1440p Ultra
58 FPS
60 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
23 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GT 430154 FPSGTX 285156 FPSGT 430108 FPSGTX 285109 FPSGT 43058 FPSGTX 28560 FPSGT 43021 FPSGTX 28523 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GT 430100 FPSGTX 285101 FPSGT 43086 FPSGTX 28586 FPSGT 43042 FPSGTX 28544 FPSGT 43014 FPSGTX 28515 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GT 430126 FPSGTX 285127 FPSGT 43081 FPSGTX 28582 FPSGT 43053 FPSGTX 28554 FPSGT 43031 FPSGTX 28533 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGT 43081 FPSGTX 28582 FPSGT 43068 FPSGTX 28568 FPSGT 43038 FPSGTX 28539 FPSGT 43014 FPSGTX 28516 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10031310%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10032313%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10034340%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10043430%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001005165%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10036360%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10036360%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10034340%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10035350%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.010.0
VulkanVulkan 1.2 (driver support)Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.3
Architecture and release
ArchitectureFermiTesla 2.0
Process node40 nmBetter55 nm
Release date20102008
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count585 million1400 millionBetter
Die size116 mm²Better470 mm²
Shader units / cores96240Better
Base clock700 MHzBetter648 MHz
Boost clock700 MHzBetter648 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 2x16
Length145 mmBetter267 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU200 WBetter550 W
Power connectorNone6+6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.3aBoard dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentBoard dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors33
Max resolution2560 × 16002560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM1 GB GDDR31 GB GDDR3
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Memory bus128 bit512 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.2690.709Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GT 430 or GTX 285?+
GT 430 has the higher overall gaming score, while GT 430 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GT 430 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GT 430 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GT 430 offers more overall performance, while GT 430 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GT 430 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GT 430 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GT 430 leads in combined 1440p performance. GT 430 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GT 430 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GT 430 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GT 430 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GT 430 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.