NVIDIA
GeForce GT 630 vs Mobility Radeon 9600
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
ATI
Mobility Radeon 9600
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GT 630 and Mobility Radeon 9600 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GT 630 outperforms Mobility Radeon 9600 by ~11% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+11%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce GT 630 (~63%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GT 630
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Mobility Radeon 9600
- Recorded feature support: Not supported · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
ATIPerformance
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3128
10064
434
Graphics card ranking
Positions 135–140of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GT 630
61 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31Better
28
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29Better
27
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26Better
24
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
25
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
32
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DirectX
HDMI
Device class
Vulkan
USB Type-C
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Release date
Architecture
Interface
Power connector
Thickness
Max monitors
Max resolution
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Memory type
Power consumption—
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
DisplayPort
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GT 630 and Mobility Radeon 9600 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GT 630Mobility Radeon 9600
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
154 FPS
143 FPS
1080p Ultra
108 FPS
101 FPS
1440p Ultra
58 FPS
54 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
19 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GT 630154 FPSMobility Radeon 9600143 FPSGT 630108 FPSMobility Radeon 9600101 FPSGT 63058 FPSMobility Radeon 960054 FPSGT 63021 FPSMobility Radeon 960019 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GT 630100 FPSMobility Radeon 960092 FPSGT 63086 FPSMobility Radeon 960080 FPSGT 63042 FPSMobility Radeon 960039 FPSGT 63014 FPSMobility Radeon 960013 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GT 630126 FPSMobility Radeon 9600117 FPSGT 63081 FPSMobility Radeon 960075 FPSGT 63053 FPSMobility Radeon 960049 FPSGT 63031 FPSMobility Radeon 960029 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGT 63081 FPSMobility Radeon 960075 FPSGT 63068 FPSMobility Radeon 960063 FPSGT 63038 FPSMobility Radeon 960035 FPSGT 63014 FPSMobility Radeon 960013 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100312810%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100322237%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100342147%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100434166%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100361772%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100361867%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100342147%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100381587%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100352150%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.09.0
Vulkan1.2Not supported
OpenGL4.62.0
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1Not supported
Architecture and release
ArchitectureFermiRadeon R300/R400
Process node40 nmBetter130 nm
Release date20122004
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count585 millionBetter76 million
Die size116 mm²92 mm²Better
Shader units / cores96Not publicly specified
Base clock810 MHzBetter300 MHz
Boost clock810 MHzBetter300 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16AGP 8x
Length145 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessSingle-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU250 WOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.3aOEM dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors3OEM dependent
Max resolution2560 × 1600OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM1 GB DDR3Better0.128 GB DDR
Memory typeDDR3DDR / DDR2
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS0.311Not published (legacy architecture)
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GT 630 or Mobility Radeon 9600?+
GT 630 has the higher overall gaming score, while GT 630 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GT 630 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GT 630 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GT 630 offers more overall performance, while GT 630 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GT 630 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GT 630 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GT 630 leads in combined 1440p performance. GT 630 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GT 630 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GT 630 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GT 630 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GT 630 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.