NVIDIA
GeForce GT 640 vs GeForce GT 710
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GT 710
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GT 640 and GT 710 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GT 640 outperforms GT 710 by ~1% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+1%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Equal catalog scores
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GT 640
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.0 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GT 710
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3131
100100
100100
4343
Graphics card ranking
Positions 136–141of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GT 640
126 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GT 640
Price $29.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
DisplayPort
Device class
Max monitors
USB Type-C
OpenGL
DirectX
Vulkan
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Max resolution
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Process node
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequency
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GT 640 and GT 710 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GT 640GT 710
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
156 FPS
156 FPS
1080p Ultra
109 FPS
110 FPS
1440p Ultra
59 FPS
59 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GT 640156 FPSGT 710156 FPSGT 640109 FPSGT 710110 FPSGT 64059 FPSGT 71059 FPSGT 64021 FPSGT 71021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GT 640100 FPSGT 710101 FPSGT 64086 FPSGT 71087 FPSGT 64043 FPSGT 71043 FPSGT 64014 FPSGT 71014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GT 640127 FPSGT 710127 FPSGT 64082 FPSGT 71082 FPSGT 64053 FPSGT 71053 FPSGT 64031 FPSGT 71031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGT 64082 FPSGT 71082 FPSGT 64069 FPSGT 71069 FPSGT 64038 FPSGT 71038 FPSGT 64014 FPSGT 71014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10031310%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10033330%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10034340%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10043430%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10036360%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10036360%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10034340%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10035350%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.011.0
Vulkan1.21.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.0OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureKeplerFermi 2.0
Process node28 nm28 nm
Release date20122014
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count1270 millionBetter292 million
Die size118 mm²79 mm²Better
Shader units / cores384Better48
Base clock900 MHz954 MHzBetter
Boost clock900 MHz954 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 2x8
Length145 mm145 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU250 W200 WBetter
Power connectorNoneNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.4aHDMI 1.3a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.2Board dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors33
Max resolution4096 × 21602560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR32 GB GDDR3
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS0.693Better0.155
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (6)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GT 640 or GT 710?+
GT 640 has the higher overall gaming score, while GT 640 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GT 640 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GT 640 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GT 640 offers more overall performance, while GT 640 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GT 640 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GT 640 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GT 640 leads in combined 1440p performance. GT 640 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GT 640 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GT 710 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GT 710 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GT 640 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.