NVIDIA
GeForce GT 710 vs GeForce GTX 465
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTX 465
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GT 710 and GTX 465 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GT 710 outperforms GTX 465 by ~1% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+1%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce GT 710 (~24%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GT 710
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GTX 465
- More graphics memory
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.0 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3131
10052
100100
4356
Graphics card ranking
Positions 137–142of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 465
115 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 465
Price $29.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
52
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
Device class
Vulkan
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
DisplayPort
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GT 710 and GTX 465 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GT 710GTX 465
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
156 FPS
156 FPS
1080p Ultra
110 FPS
107 FPS
1440p Ultra
59 FPS
61 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
23 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GT 710156 FPSGTX 465156 FPSGT 710110 FPSGTX 465107 FPSGT 71059 FPSGTX 46561 FPSGT 71021 FPSGTX 46523 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GT 710101 FPSGTX 465101 FPSGT 71087 FPSGTX 46585 FPSGT 71043 FPSGTX 46545 FPSGT 71014 FPSGTX 46515 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GT 710127 FPSGTX 465127 FPSGT 71082 FPSGTX 46580 FPSGT 71053 FPSGTX 46555 FPSGT 71031 FPSGTX 46533 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGT 71082 FPSGTX 46582 FPSGT 71069 FPSGTX 46567 FPSGT 71038 FPSGTX 46540 FPSGT 71014 FPSGTX 46515 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10031310%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10033330%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100343811%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100435626%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001005263%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100364215%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100364113%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100343811%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100384517%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10035388%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.011.0
Vulkan1.2Vulkan 1.2 (driver support)
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureFermi 2.0Fermi
Process node28 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20142010
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count292 million3100 millionBetter
Die size79 mm²Better529 mm²
Shader units / cores48352Better
Base clock954 MHzBetter607 MHz
Boost clock954 MHzBetter607 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x8PCIe 2x16
Length145 mmBetter241 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU200 WBetter550 W
Power connectorNone6+6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.3amini-HDMI 1.3a
DisplayPortBoard dependentBoard dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors33
Max resolution2560 × 16002560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR3Better1 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.1550.855Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (6)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GT 710 or GTX 465?+
GT 710 has the higher overall gaming score, while GT 710 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GT 710 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GT 710 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GT 710 offers more overall performance, while GT 710 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GT 710 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GT 710 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GT 710 leads in combined 1440p performance. GT 710 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GT 710 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GT 710 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GT 710 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GT 710 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.