NVIDIA
GeForce GT 710 vs Mobility Radeon X1300
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
ATI
Mobility Radeon X1300
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GT 710 and Mobility Radeon X1300 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GT 710 outperforms Mobility Radeon X1300 by ~11% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+11%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce GT 710 (~63%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GT 710
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Mobility Radeon X1300
- Recorded feature support: Not supported · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
ATIPerformance
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3128
10064
432
Graphics card ranking
Positions 137–142of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GT 710
97 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31Better
28
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29Better
27
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26Better
24
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
25
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
32
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
Device class
Vulkan
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
ArchitectureBetter
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumption—
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
DisplayPort
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GT 710 and Mobility Radeon X1300 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GT 710Mobility Radeon X1300
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
156 FPS
143 FPS
1080p Ultra
110 FPS
101 FPS
1440p Ultra
59 FPS
54 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
19 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GT 710156 FPSMobility Radeon X1300143 FPSGT 710110 FPSMobility Radeon X1300101 FPSGT 71059 FPSMobility Radeon X130054 FPSGT 71021 FPSMobility Radeon X130019 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GT 710101 FPSMobility Radeon X130093 FPSGT 71087 FPSMobility Radeon X130080 FPSGT 71043 FPSMobility Radeon X130039 FPSGT 71014 FPSMobility Radeon X130013 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GT 710127 FPSMobility Radeon X1300117 FPSGT 71082 FPSMobility Radeon X130076 FPSGT 71053 FPSMobility Radeon X130049 FPSGT 71031 FPSMobility Radeon X130029 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGT 71082 FPSMobility Radeon X130076 FPSGT 71069 FPSMobility Radeon X130063 FPSGT 71038 FPSMobility Radeon X130035 FPSGT 71014 FPSMobility Radeon X130013 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100312810%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100332240%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100342147%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100432182%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100361677%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100361867%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100342147%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100381492%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100352055%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.09.3
Vulkan1.2Not supported
OpenGL4.62.1
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1Not supported
Architecture and release
ArchitectureFermi 2.0Radeon R500Better
Process node28 nmBetter90 nm
Release date20142006
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count292 millionBetter107 million
Die size79 mm²Better100 mm²
Shader units / cores48Not publicly specified
Base clock954 MHzBetter392 MHz
Boost clock954 MHzBetter392 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length145 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessSingle-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU200 WOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.3aOEM dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors3OEM dependent
Max resolution2560 × 1600OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR3Better0.064 GB DDR
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3 / DDR2
Memory bus64 bit64 bit
TFLOPS0.155Not published (legacy architecture)
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GT 710 or Mobility Radeon X1300?+
GT 710 has the higher overall gaming score, while GT 710 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GT 710 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GT 710 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GT 710 offers more overall performance, while GT 710 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GT 710 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GT 710 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GT 710 leads in combined 1440p performance. GT 710 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GT 710 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GT 710 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GT 710 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GT 710 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.