NVIDIA
GeForce GT 710 vs GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
RTX 2060 SUPER
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GT 710 and RTX 2060 SUPER across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 2060 SUPER outperforms GT 710 by ~42% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+42%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce GT 710 (~6%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GT 710
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider RTX 2060 SUPER
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5 · DLSS 2
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3144
10084
10056
4368
Graphics card ranking
Positions 71–76of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
98 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GT 710
Price $40.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31
44Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
38Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
36Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
84
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
49
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
Device class
Vulkan
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
DisplayPort
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GT 710 and RTX 2060 SUPER across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GT 710RTX 2060 SUPER
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
156 FPS
194 FPS
1080p Ultra
110 FPS
136 FPS
1440p Ultra
59 FPS
106 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
39 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GT 710156 FPSRTX 2060 SUPER194 FPSGT 710110 FPSRTX 2060 SUPER136 FPSGT 71059 FPSRTX 2060 SUPER106 FPSGT 71021 FPSRTX 2060 SUPER39 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GT 710101 FPSRTX 2060 SUPER125 FPSGT 71087 FPSRTX 2060 SUPER108 FPSGT 71043 FPSRTX 2060 SUPER77 FPSGT 71014 FPSRTX 2060 SUPER26 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GT 710127 FPSRTX 2060 SUPER158 FPSGT 71082 FPSRTX 2060 SUPER102 FPSGT 71053 FPSRTX 2060 SUPER95 FPSGT 71031 FPSRTX 2060 SUPER58 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGT 71082 FPSRTX 2060 SUPER102 FPSGT 71069 FPSRTX 2060 SUPER86 FPSGT 71038 FPSRTX 2060 SUPER69 FPSGT 71014 FPSRTX 2060 SUPER27 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100314435%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100334939%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100345140%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100436845%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001008417%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100365542%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100365440%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100345140%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100385740%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100355137%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.012.2
Vulkan1.21.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedDLSS 2
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Architecture and release
ArchitectureFermi 2.0Turing
Process node28 nm12 nmBetter
Release date20142019
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count292 million10800 millionBetter
Die size79 mm²Better445 mm²
Shader units / cores482176Better
Base clock954 MHz1470 MHzBetter
Boost clock954 MHz1650 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x8PCIe 3x16
Length145 mmBetter229 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU200 WBetter450 W
Power connectorNone8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.3aHDMI 2.0
DisplayPortBoard dependentDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoYes
Max monitors35
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR38 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.1557.181Better
Other comparisons
RX 6800AMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (5)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GT 710 or RTX 2060 SUPER?+
GT 710 has the higher overall gaming score, while GT 710 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GT 710 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GT 710 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GT 710 offers more overall performance, while GT 710 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GT 710 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GT 710 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GT 710 leads in combined 1440p performance. GT 710 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GT 710 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GT 710 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GT 710 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GT 710 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.