NVIDIA
GeForce GT 730 vs Radeon Pro W6800
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Pro W6800
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GT 730 and Pro W6800 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GT 730 outperforms Pro W6800 by ~1% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+1%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Equal catalog scores
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GT 730
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Pro W6800
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3154
10072
10051
43100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 138–143of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GT 730
137 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GT 730
Price $8.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31
54Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
45Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
43Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
72
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
Device class
Vulkan
USB Type-C
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Architecture
Max monitors
Thickness
Max resolution
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
DisplayPort
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GT 730 and Pro W6800 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GT 730Pro W6800
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
156 FPS
221 FPS
1080p Ultra
110 FPS
155 FPS
1440p Ultra
59 FPS
121 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
60 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GT 730156 FPSPro W6800221 FPSGT 730110 FPSPro W6800155 FPSGT 73059 FPSPro W6800121 FPSGT 73021 FPSPro W680060 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GT 730101 FPSPro W6800143 FPSGT 73087 FPSPro W6800123 FPSGT 73043 FPSPro W680088 FPSGT 73014 FPSPro W680040 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GT 730127 FPSPro W6800180 FPSGT 73082 FPSPro W6800117 FPSGT 73053 FPSPro W6800109 FPSGT 73031 FPSPro W680088 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGT 73082 FPSPro W6800117 FPSGT 73069 FPSPro W680097 FPSGT 73038 FPSPro W680078 FPSGT 73014 FPSPro W680041 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100315454%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100336464%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100346765%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1004310080%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007233%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100367570%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100367267%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100346765%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100387970%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100356864%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.012.2
Vulkan1.21.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureFermiRDNA 2.0
Process node40 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20142021
Device classDesktopProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count585 million26800 millionBetter
Die size116 mm²Better520 mm²
Shader units / cores963840Better
Base clock902 MHz2075 MHzBetter
Boost clock902 MHz2320 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x16
Length145 mmBetter267 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU200 WBetter600 W
Power connectorNone6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.3aHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortBoard dependentDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors36
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR332 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.26917.83Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GT 730 or Pro W6800?+
GT 730 has the higher overall gaming score, while GT 730 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GT 730 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GT 730 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GT 730 offers more overall performance, while GT 730 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GT 730 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GT 730 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GT 730 leads in combined 1440p performance. GT 730 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GT 730 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GT 730 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GT 730 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GT 730 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.