NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon Vega II 8CU 4700G
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Vega II 8CU 4700G
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GTX 1650 SUPER and Vega II 8CU 4700G across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Vega II 8CU 4700G outperforms GTX 1650 SUPER by 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+22%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon Vega II 8CU 4700G: key takeaway
The comparison of GTX 1650 SUPER and Vega II 8CU 4700G shows a 22% advantage for Vega II 8CU 4700G in gaming performance, while GTX 1650 SUPER may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
3745
100100
COMPARISON RESULT
GTX 1650 SUPER is the best overall choice
GTX 1650 SUPER leads in combined game performance. GTX 1650 SUPER offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
GTX 1650 SUPER leads in the combined performance index
GTX 1650 SUPER costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 123–128of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
172 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon Vega II 8CU 4700G
100/100 · Price $169The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
37
45Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
33
39Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31
36Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
51
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61Better
58
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
Max monitors34
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
OpenGL4.64.6
DirectX12.112.2
Vulkan1.41.2
TFLOPS4.416Better2.1
Power consumption100 W—
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Clock speed1530 - 1725 MHzBetter400 - 2100 MHz
Base clock1530 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock1725 MHz2100 MHzBetter
VRAM4 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory frequency12 GHz—
Memory bus128 bit—
Power connector6 pin—
Release date20192020
ArchitectureTuringNot publicly specified
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Upscaling—FSR
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s—
InterfacePCIe 3x16IGP
Power consumption100 W—
Process node12 nm7 nmBetter
Recommended PSU300 WVaries by board
Length229 mmVaries by board
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$229—
Shader units / cores1280Not publicly specified
Die size284 mm²Not publicly specified
Memory cacheL1 64 KB, L2 1 MBNot publicly specified
Transistor count6600 millionNot publicly specified
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and Vega II 8CU 4700G across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GTX 1650 SUPERVega II 8CU 4700G
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
22 FPSEstimated 66%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
19 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 60%
14 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
8 FPSEstimated 66%
Black Myth: WukongGTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Call of Duty: WarzoneGTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2GTX 1650 SUPER187 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 8CU 4700G185 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER131 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 8CU 4700G130 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER73 FPSEstimated 68%Vega II 8CU 4700G101 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER23 FPSEstimated 62%Vega II 8CU 4700G50 FPSEstimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077GTX 1650 SUPER121 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 8CU 4700G119 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER104 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 8CU 4700G103 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER53 FPSEstimated 68%Vega II 8CU 4700G73 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER15 FPSEstimated 62%Vega II 8CU 4700G34 FPSEstimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5GTX 1650 SUPER152 FPSEstimated 80%Vega II 8CU 4700G150 FPSEstimated 80%GTX 1650 SUPER99 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 8CU 4700G97 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER66 FPSEstimated 68%Vega II 8CU 4700G91 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER34 FPSEstimated 62%Vega II 8CU 4700G74 FPSEstimated 74%
God of War RagnarökGTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Hogwarts LegacyGTX 1650 SUPER99 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 8CU 4700G97 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER82 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 8CU 4700G81 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER48 FPSEstimated 68%Vega II 8CU 4700G65 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER16 FPSEstimated 62%Vega II 8CU 4700G34 FPSEstimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024GTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Monster Hunter WildsGTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%
StarfieldGTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G22 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 8CU 4700G19 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%Vega II 8CU 4700G14 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 8CU 4700G8 FPSEstimated 66%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100374520%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100444911%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10044452%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100600200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10048456%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10046452%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10044452%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100504511%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10044452%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.112.2
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling—FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureTuringNot publicly specified
Process node12 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20192020
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count6600 millionNot publicly specified
Die size284 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores1280Not publicly specified
Base clock1530 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock1725 MHz2100 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 3x16IGP
Length229 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU300 WVaries by board
Power connector6 pin—
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors34
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and Vega II 8CU 4700G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM4 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Memory bus128 bit—
TFLOPS4.416Better2.1
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310IntelReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1650 SUPER or Vega II 8CU 4700G?+
GTX 1650 SUPER has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1650 SUPER offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 1650 SUPER offers more overall performance, while GTX 1650 SUPER offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 1650 SUPER leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 1650 SUPER can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 1650 SUPER if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.