NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon RX 560 4GB
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 560 4GB
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 560 4GB across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GTX 1660 SUPER outperforms RX 560 4GB by 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+21%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon RX 560 4GB: key takeaway
The comparison of GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 560 4GB shows a 21% advantage for GTX 1660 SUPER in gaming performance, while RX 560 4GB may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4033
100100
100100
6056
COMPARISON RESULT
GTX 1660 SUPER is the best overall choice
GTX 1660 SUPER leads in combined game performance. GTX 1660 SUPER offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
GTX 1660 SUPER leads in the combined performance index
RX 560 4GB costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 70–75of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
179 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 560 4GB
100/100 · Price $179The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 560 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
40Better
33
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
35Better
30
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
33Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63Better
58
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 560 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.0b
Device classDesktopDesktop
Max monitors3Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
DirectX12.112.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS5.027Better2.611
Power consumption125 W75 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Clock speed1530 - 1785 MHzBetter1175 - 1275 MHz
Base clock1530 MHzBetter1175 MHz
Boost clock1785 MHzBetter1275 MHz
VRAM6 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR5
Power connector8 pin6 pin
Release date20192017
ArchitectureTuringPolaris
Memory frequency14 GHzBetter7 GHz
Memory bus192 bitBetter128 bit
Memory bandwidth336 GB/sBetter112 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x8
Power consumption125 W75 WBetter
Process node12 nmBetter14 nm
Recommended PSU300 WVaries by board
Length229 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5—
Launch price$229—
Shader units / cores1408Better896
Die size284 mm²123 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 64 KB, L2 1.5 MBL1 16 KB, L2 1 MB
Transistor count6600 millionBetter3000 million
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 560 4GB across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GTX 1660 SUPERRX 560 4GB
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
23 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
16 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
13 FPSEstimated 63%
9 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 56%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: WukongGTX 1660 SUPER23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB20 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1660 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1660 SUPER13 FPSEstimated 63%RX 560 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%GTX 1660 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 560 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneGTX 1660 SUPER23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB20 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1660 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1660 SUPER13 FPSEstimated 63%RX 560 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%GTX 1660 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 560 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2GTX 1660 SUPER190 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB165 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 1660 SUPER133 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB114 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 1660 SUPER91 FPSEstimated 71%RX 560 4GB63 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER28 FPSEstimated 64%RX 560 4GB22 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077GTX 1660 SUPER122 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB107 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 1660 SUPER105 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB90 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 1660 SUPER66 FPSEstimated 71%RX 560 4GB46 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 64%RX 560 4GB15 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5GTX 1660 SUPER154 FPSEstimated 80%RX 560 4GB135 FPSEstimated 78%GTX 1660 SUPER100 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB86 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 1660 SUPER82 FPSEstimated 71%RX 560 4GB57 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER41 FPSEstimated 64%RX 560 4GB32 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökGTX 1660 SUPER23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB20 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1660 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1660 SUPER13 FPSEstimated 63%RX 560 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%GTX 1660 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 560 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyGTX 1660 SUPER100 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB87 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 1660 SUPER84 FPSEstimated 74%RX 560 4GB72 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 1660 SUPER59 FPSEstimated 71%RX 560 4GB41 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 64%RX 560 4GB15 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024GTX 1660 SUPER23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB20 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1660 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1660 SUPER13 FPSEstimated 63%RX 560 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%GTX 1660 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 560 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsGTX 1660 SUPER23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB20 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1660 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1660 SUPER13 FPSEstimated 63%RX 560 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%GTX 1660 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 560 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldGTX 1660 SUPER23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB20 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1660 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 560 4GB16 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1660 SUPER13 FPSEstimated 63%RX 560 4GB9 FPSEstimated 58%GTX 1660 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 560 4GB5 FPSEstimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 560 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100403319%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100463819%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100463916%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10060567%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 560 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100494313%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100484213%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100463916%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100514513%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100464014%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 560 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.112.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5—
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 560 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureTuringPolaris
Process node12 nmBetter14 nm
Release date20192017
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 560 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count6600 millionBetter3000 million
Die size284 mm²123 mm²Better
Shader units / cores1408Better896
Base clock1530 MHzBetter1175 MHz
Boost clock1785 MHzBetter1275 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 560 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x8
Length229 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU300 WVaries by board
Power connector8 pin6 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 560 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors3Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 560 4GB with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM6 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus192 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS5.027Better2.611
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310IntelReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1660 SUPER or RX 560 4GB?+
GTX 1660 SUPER has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1660 SUPER offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1660 SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1660 SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 1660 SUPER offers more overall performance, while GTX 1660 SUPER offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1660 SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1660 SUPER is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 1660 SUPER leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 1660 SUPER can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 1660 SUPER is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 560 4GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 560 4GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 1660 SUPER if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.