NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Vega 11CU 2400G
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Vega 11CU 2400G
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GTX 1660 Ti and Vega 11CU 2400G across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Vega 11CU 2400G outperforms GTX 1660 Ti by 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+10%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Vega 11CU 2400G: key takeaway
The comparison of GTX 1660 Ti and Vega 11CU 2400G shows a 10% advantage for Vega 11CU 2400G in gaming performance, while GTX 1660 Ti may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
3943
100100
COMPARISON RESULT
GTX 1660 Ti is the best overall choice
GTX 1660 Ti leads in combined game performance. GTX 1660 Ti offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
GTX 1660 Ti leads in the combined performance index
GTX 1660 Ti costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 106–111of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
97 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon Vega 11CU 2400G
100/100 · Price $119The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares GTX 1660 Ti and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39
43Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
37Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32
35Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
50
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
57
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares GTX 1660 Ti and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4
Device classDesktopDesktop
USB Type-CNoNo
DirectX12.112.0
Max monitors3Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS5.437Better1.76
Power consumption120 W—
Clock speed1500 - 1770 MHzBetter300 - 1250 MHz
Base clock1500 MHzBetter300 MHz
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Power connector8 pin—
Boost clock1770 MHzBetter1250 MHz
VRAM6 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory frequency12 GHz—
Memory bus192 bit—
Memory bandwidth288 GB/s—
InterfacePCIe 3x16IGP
Release date20192018
ArchitectureTuringNot publicly specified
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5—
Launch price$229—
Power consumption120 W—
Process node12 nmBetter14 nm
Recommended PSU300 WVaries by board
Length229 mmVaries by board
Die size284 mm²Not publicly specified
Transistor count6600 millionNot publicly specified
Shader units / cores1536Not publicly specified
Memory cacheL1 64 KB, L2 1.5 MBNot publicly specified
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GTX 1660 Ti and Vega 11CU 2400G across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GTX 1660 TiVega 11CU 2400G
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
23 FPSEstimated 66%
21 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
18 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
12 FPSEstimated 63%
14 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
8 FPSEstimated 66%
Black Myth: WukongGTX 1660 Ti23 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G21 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti19 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti12 FPSEstimated 63%Vega 11CU 2400G14 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega 11CU 2400G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Call of Duty: WarzoneGTX 1660 Ti23 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G21 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti19 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti12 FPSEstimated 63%Vega 11CU 2400G14 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega 11CU 2400G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2GTX 1660 Ti191 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G178 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 Ti134 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G125 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 Ti88 FPSEstimated 71%Vega 11CU 2400G97 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 Ti27 FPSEstimated 63%Vega 11CU 2400G48 FPSEstimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077GTX 1660 Ti123 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G115 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 Ti106 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G99 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 Ti64 FPSEstimated 71%Vega 11CU 2400G71 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 Ti18 FPSEstimated 63%Vega 11CU 2400G32 FPSEstimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5GTX 1660 Ti155 FPSEstimated 80%Vega 11CU 2400G145 FPSEstimated 80%GTX 1660 Ti101 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G94 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 Ti79 FPSEstimated 71%Vega 11CU 2400G88 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 Ti39 FPSEstimated 63%Vega 11CU 2400G71 FPSEstimated 74%
God of War RagnarökGTX 1660 Ti23 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G21 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti19 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti12 FPSEstimated 63%Vega 11CU 2400G14 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega 11CU 2400G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Hogwarts LegacyGTX 1660 Ti101 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G94 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 Ti84 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G79 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 Ti57 FPSEstimated 71%Vega 11CU 2400G63 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 Ti18 FPSEstimated 63%Vega 11CU 2400G33 FPSEstimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024GTX 1660 Ti23 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G21 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti19 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti12 FPSEstimated 63%Vega 11CU 2400G14 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega 11CU 2400G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Monster Hunter WildsGTX 1660 Ti23 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G21 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti19 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti12 FPSEstimated 63%Vega 11CU 2400G14 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega 11CU 2400G8 FPSEstimated 66%
StarfieldGTX 1660 Ti23 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G21 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti19 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti12 FPSEstimated 63%Vega 11CU 2400G14 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 Ti5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega 11CU 2400G8 FPSEstimated 66%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares GTX 1660 Ti and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100394310%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10045435%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10045435%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100600200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares GTX 1660 Ti and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100494313%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100484311%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10045435%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100514317%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10045435%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares GTX 1660 Ti and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.112.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5—
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares GTX 1660 Ti and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureTuringNot publicly specified
Process node12 nmBetter14 nm
Release date20192018
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares GTX 1660 Ti and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count6600 millionNot publicly specified
Die size284 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores1536Not publicly specified
Base clock1500 MHzBetter300 MHz
Boost clock1770 MHzBetter1250 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares GTX 1660 Ti and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 3x16IGP
Length229 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU300 WVaries by board
Power connector8 pin—
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares GTX 1660 Ti and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors3Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares GTX 1660 Ti and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM6 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Memory bus192 bit—
TFLOPS5.437Better1.76
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310IntelReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1660 Ti or Vega 11CU 2400G?+
GTX 1660 Ti has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1660 Ti offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1660 Ti is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1660 Ti is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 1660 Ti offers more overall performance, while GTX 1660 Ti offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1660 Ti is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1660 Ti is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 1660 Ti leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 1660 Ti can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 1660 Ti is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 1660 Ti is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 1660 Ti is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 1660 Ti if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.