NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 260 vs GeForce GT 230
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GT 230
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GTX 260 and GT 230 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GTX 260 outperforms GT 230 by ~15% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+15%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce GTX 260 (~2%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GTX 260
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.3 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GT 230
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4539
82100
100100
2013
Graphics card ranking
Positions 69–74of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GT 230
171 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
45Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
39Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
82
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58Better
57
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Memory type
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Interface
Transistor countBetter
Power connector
Release date
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Architecture
Recommended PSUBetter
Length
Vulkan
DisplayPort
HDMI
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GTX 260 and GT 230 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GTX 260GT 230
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
227 FPS
196 FPS
1080p Ultra
160 FPS
138 FPS
1440p Ultra
89 FPS
77 FPS
4K Ultra
34 FPS
29 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GTX 260227 FPSGT 230196 FPSGTX 260160 FPSGT 230138 FPSGTX 26089 FPSGT 23077 FPSGTX 26034 FPSGT 23029 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GTX 260147 FPSGT 230126 FPSGTX 260126 FPSGT 230109 FPSGTX 26065 FPSGT 23056 FPSGTX 26023 FPSGT 23020 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GTX 260185 FPSGT 230159 FPSGTX 260120 FPSGT 230103 FPSGTX 26081 FPSGT 23069 FPSGTX 26050 FPSGT 23043 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGTX 260120 FPSGT 230103 FPSGTX 260100 FPSGT 23086 FPSGTX 26058 FPSGT 23050 FPSGTX 26023 FPSGT 23020 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100453914%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100373214%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100383217%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100201342%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008210020%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100342723%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100352822%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100383217%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100312425%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100373118%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX10.010.0
VulkanNot supportedNot supported
OpenGL3.33.3
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.3OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTesla 2.0Tesla
Process node65 nm55 nmBetter
Release date20082009
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count1400 millionBetter505 million
Die size576 mm²196 mm²Better
Shader units / cores192Better48
Base clock576 MHz650 MHzBetter
Boost clock576 MHz650 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 2x16
Length267 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU450 W250 WBetter
Power connector6+6 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIBoard dependentBoard dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentBoard dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors3Varies by board
Max resolution2560 × 1600Varies by board
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM896 MB GDDR3Better512 MB GDDR3
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Memory bus448 bitBetter256 bit
TFLOPS0.477Better0.156
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 260 or GT 230?+
GTX 260 has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 260 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 260 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 260 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 260 offers more overall performance, while GTX 260 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 260 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 260 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 260 leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 260 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 260 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GT 230 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GT 230 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 260 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.