NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 560 vs Intel Arc A370M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Intel Arc A370M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GTX 560 and Intel Arc A370M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Intel Arc A370M outperforms GTX 560 by ~3% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+3%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce GTX 560 (~7%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GTX 560
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Intel Arc A370M
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
IntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3233
71100
10055
5660
Graphics card ranking
Positions 222–227of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 560
150 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32
33Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
30Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27
28Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
71
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
47Better
44
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
Device class
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Power consumptionBetter
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Thickness
Architecture
Memory type
Power connector
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Release date
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Transistor countBetter
Vulkan
Upscaling
DisplayPort
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GTX 560 and Intel Arc A370M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GTX 560Intel Arc A370M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
160 FPS
166 FPS
1080p Ultra
109 FPS
116 FPS
1440p Ultra
62 FPS
63 FPS
4K Ultra
23 FPS
22 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GTX 560160 FPSIntel Arc A370M166 FPSGTX 560109 FPSIntel Arc A370M116 FPSGTX 56062 FPSIntel Arc A370M63 FPSGTX 56023 FPSIntel Arc A370M22 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GTX 560103 FPSIntel Arc A370M107 FPSGTX 56086 FPSIntel Arc A370M92 FPSGTX 56045 FPSIntel Arc A370M45 FPSGTX 56015 FPSIntel Arc A370M15 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GTX 560130 FPSIntel Arc A370M135 FPSGTX 56082 FPSIntel Arc A370M87 FPSGTX 56056 FPSIntel Arc A370M57 FPSGTX 56034 FPSIntel Arc A370M33 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGTX 56084 FPSIntel Arc A370M87 FPSGTX 56068 FPSIntel Arc A370M73 FPSGTX 56040 FPSIntel Arc A370M41 FPSGTX 56016 FPSIntel Arc A370M15 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10032333%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100354218%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10039415%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10056607%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1007110034%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10043455%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10041447%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10039415%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10045486%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10039415%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.012.2
VulkanVulkan 1.2 (driver support)1.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedXeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureFermi 2.0Xe HPG (Alchemist)
Process node40 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20112022
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count1950 million7200 millionBetter
Die size332 mm²157 mm²Better
Shader units / cores3361024Better
Base clock810 MHz1550 MHzBetter
Boost clock810 MHz2050 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length210 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU450 WOEM dependent
Power connector6+6 pinIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMImini-HDMI 1.3aOEM dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors3OEM dependent
Max resolution2560 × 1600Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM1 GB GDDR54 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS1.0894.198Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 560 or Intel Arc A370M?+
GTX 560 has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 560 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 560 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 560 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 560 offers more overall performance, while GTX 560 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 560 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 560 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 560 leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 560 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 560 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Intel Arc A370M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Intel Arc A370M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 560 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.