NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 750 vs Intel Arc A550M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Intel Arc A550M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GTX 750 and Intel Arc A550M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Intel Arc A550M outperforms GTX 750 by ~25% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+25%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce GTX 750 (~4%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GTX 750
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Intel Arc A550M
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
IntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3240
100100
10058
5668
Graphics card ranking
Positions 145–150of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 750
173 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32
40Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
35Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27
33Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
50
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
Device class
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory bus
Clock speedBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Transistor countBetter
DisplayPort
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GTX 750 and Intel Arc A550M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GTX 750Intel Arc A550M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
161 FPS
195 FPS
1080p Ultra
111 FPS
137 FPS
1440p Ultra
61 FPS
91 FPS
4K Ultra
22 FPS
27 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GTX 750161 FPSIntel Arc A550M195 FPSGTX 750111 FPSIntel Arc A550M137 FPSGTX 75061 FPSIntel Arc A550M91 FPSGTX 75022 FPSIntel Arc A550M27 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GTX 750104 FPSIntel Arc A550M126 FPSGTX 75088 FPSIntel Arc A550M108 FPSGTX 75044 FPSIntel Arc A550M66 FPSGTX 75014 FPSIntel Arc A550M18 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GTX 750131 FPSIntel Arc A550M159 FPSGTX 75083 FPSIntel Arc A550M103 FPSGTX 75055 FPSIntel Arc A550M82 FPSGTX 75032 FPSIntel Arc A550M39 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGTX 75085 FPSIntel Arc A550M103 FPSGTX 75070 FPSIntel Arc A550M86 FPSGTX 75040 FPSIntel Arc A550M59 FPSGTX 75015 FPSIntel Arc A550M18 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100324022%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100364829%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100394821%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100566819%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100435321%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100415122%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100394821%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100455622%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100394821%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.012.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedXeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureMaxwellXe HPG (Alchemist)
Process node28 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20142022
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count1870 million21700 millionBetter
Die size148 mm²Better406 mm²
Shader units / cores5122048Better
Base clock1020 MHzBetter900 MHz
Boost clock1085 MHz2050 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessSingle-slotIGP
Recommended PSU250 WOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMImini-HDMI 1.4aOEM dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors3OEM dependent
Max resolution4096 × 2160Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM1 GB GDDR58 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
TFLOPS1.1118.397Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 750 or Intel Arc A550M?+
GTX 750 has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 750 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 750 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 750 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 750 offers more overall performance, while GTX 750 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 750 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 750 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 750 leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 750 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 750 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 750 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 750 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 750 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.