NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 750 vs GeForce RTX 4060
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
RTX 4060
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GTX 750 and RTX 4060 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 4060 outperforms GTX 750 by ~44% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+44%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce GTX 750 (~4%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GTX 750
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0 · Not supported
Reasons to consider RTX 4060
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9 · DLSS 3
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3246
100100
10041
5668
Graphics card ranking
Positions 51–56of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 750
173 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 750
Price $24.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32
46Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
40Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27
37Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
50
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
Device class
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory bus
Clock speedBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
DisplayPort
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GTX 750 and RTX 4060 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GTX 750RTX 4060
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
161 FPS
216 FPS
1080p Ultra
111 FPS
152 FPS
1440p Ultra
61 FPS
107 FPS
4K Ultra
22 FPS
32 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GTX 750161 FPSRTX 4060216 FPSGTX 750111 FPSRTX 4060152 FPSGTX 75061 FPSRTX 4060107 FPSGTX 75022 FPSRTX 406032 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GTX 750104 FPSRTX 4060139 FPSGTX 75088 FPSRTX 4060120 FPSGTX 75044 FPSRTX 406078 FPSGTX 75014 FPSRTX 406021 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GTX 750131 FPSRTX 4060176 FPSGTX 75083 FPSRTX 4060114 FPSGTX 75055 FPSRTX 406097 FPSGTX 75032 FPSRTX 406046 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGTX 75085 FPSRTX 4060114 FPSGTX 75070 FPSRTX 406095 FPSGTX 75040 FPSRTX 406070 FPSGTX 75015 FPSRTX 406022 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100324636%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100365542%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100395229%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100566819%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100435626%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100415529%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100395229%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100455825%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100395330%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.012.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedDLSS 3
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9
Architecture and release
ArchitectureMaxwellAda Lovelace
Process node28 nm5 nmBetter
Release date20142023
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count1870 million18900 millionBetter
Die size148 mm²Better159 mm²
Shader units / cores5123072Better
Base clock1020 MHz1830 MHzBetter
Boost clock1085 MHz2460 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4x8
Length145 mmBetter240 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU250 WBetter300 W
Power connectorNone8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMImini-HDMI 1.4aHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortBoard dependentDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors34
Max resolution4096 × 21607680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM1 GB GDDR58 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
TFLOPS1.11115.11Better
Other comparisons
RX 6400AMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (5)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 750 or RTX 4060?+
GTX 750 has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 750 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 750 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 750 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 750 offers more overall performance, while GTX 750 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 750 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 750 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 750 leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 750 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 750 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 750 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 750 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 750 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.