NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 770 2GB vs GeForce 710M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce 710M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GTX 770 2GB and GeForce 710M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GTX 770 2GB outperforms GeForce 710M by ~17% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+17%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce GTX 770 2GB (~7%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GTX 770 2GB
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: Not supported
Reasons to consider GeForce 710M
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3530
51100
10054
5643
Graphics card ranking
Positions 249–254of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 710M
63 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
35Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
32Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
29Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
51
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
45Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
USB Type-C
Power consumptionBetter
TFLOPSBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Clock speedBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
Recommended PSU
Length
Base clockBetter
Thickness
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Release date
Architecture
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
Compute API—
Launch price——
Process node
DisplayPort
HDMI
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GTX 770 2GB and GeForce 710M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GTX 770 2GBGeForce 710M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
179 FPS
152 FPS
1080p Ultra
126 FPS
107 FPS
1440p Ultra
70 FPS
57 FPS
4K Ultra
24 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GTX 770 2GB179 FPSGeForce 710M152 FPSGTX 770 2GB126 FPSGeForce 710M107 FPSGTX 770 2GB70 FPSGeForce 710M57 FPSGTX 770 2GB24 FPSGeForce 710M21 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GTX 770 2GB115 FPSGeForce 710M98 FPSGTX 770 2GB99 FPSGeForce 710M84 FPSGTX 770 2GB51 FPSGeForce 710M41 FPSGTX 770 2GB16 FPSGeForce 710M14 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GTX 770 2GB146 FPSGeForce 710M124 FPSGTX 770 2GB94 FPSGeForce 710M80 FPSGTX 770 2GB63 FPSGeForce 710M51 FPSGTX 770 2GB35 FPSGeForce 710M30 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGTX 770 2GB94 FPSGeForce 710M80 FPSGTX 770 2GB79 FPSGeForce 710M67 FPSGTX 770 2GB46 FPSGeForce 710M37 FPSGTX 770 2GB16 FPSGeForce 710M14 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100353015%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100383120%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100413419%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100564326%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1005110065%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100443620%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100433521%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100413419%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100463722%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100413419%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.011.0
Vulkan1.21.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute API—OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedKepler / Fermi
Process node28 nm28 nm
Release date20132013
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified585 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified116 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified96
Base clock1046 MHzBetter775 MHz
Boost clock1085 MHzBetter775 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 2.0 x16
LengthVaries by boardOEM dependent
ThicknessVaries by boardOEM dependent
Recommended PSUVaries by boardOEM dependent
Power connector6+8 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIBoard dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitorsVaries by boardOEM dependent
Max resolutionVaries by boardOEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR5Better1 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS3.333Better0.298
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 770 2GB or GeForce 710M?+
GTX 770 2GB has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 770 2GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 770 2GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 770 2GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 770 2GB offers more overall performance, while GTX 770 2GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 770 2GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 770 2GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 770 2GB leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 770 2GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 770 2GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 710M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 710M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 770 2GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.