NVIDIA
GeForce GTX TITAN vs Radeon HD 7970
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
HD 7970
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GTX TITAN and HD 7970 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GTX TITAN outperforms HD 7970 by ~6% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+6%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 15, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce GTX TITAN (~4%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GTX TITAN
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.5 · Not supported
Reasons to consider HD 7970
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3836
5148
100100
6056
Graphics card ranking
Positions 226–231of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX TITAN
96 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon HD 7970
Price $40.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
38Better
36
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34Better
32
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31Better
30
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
51Better
48
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
47Better
45
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumption
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumption
Process node
Recommended PSU
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GTX TITAN and HD 7970 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GTX TITANHD 7970
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
182 FPS
179 FPS
1080p Ultra
128 FPS
126 FPS
1440p Ultra
84 FPS
74 FPS
4K Ultra
27 FPS
25 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GTX TITAN182 FPSHD 7970179 FPSGTX TITAN128 FPSHD 7970126 FPSGTX TITAN84 FPSHD 797074 FPSGTX TITAN27 FPSHD 797025 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GTX TITAN117 FPSHD 7970116 FPSGTX TITAN101 FPSHD 7970100 FPSGTX TITAN61 FPSHD 797054 FPSGTX TITAN18 FPSHD 797017 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GTX TITAN148 FPSHD 7970146 FPSGTX TITAN96 FPSHD 797095 FPSGTX TITAN75 FPSHD 797067 FPSGTX TITAN39 FPSHD 797037 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGTX TITAN96 FPSHD 797095 FPSGTX TITAN80 FPSHD 797079 FPSGTX TITAN54 FPSHD 797048 FPSGTX TITAN18 FPSHD 797017 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10038365%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10041388%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10044425%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10060567%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 10051486%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10048456%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10047447%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10044425%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10050476%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10045427%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.011.1
Vulkan1.21.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.5OpenCL 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 1.0
Process node28 nm28 nm
Release date20132011
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count7080 millionBetter4313 million
Die size561 mm²352 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2688Better2048
Base clock889 MHz925 MHzBetter
Boost clock980 MHzBetter925 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Length267 mmBetter275 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU600 W600 W
Power connector6+8 pin6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.4aHDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.2mini-DisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution4096 × 21604096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM6 GB GDDR5Better3 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory bus384 bit384 bit
TFLOPS4.709Better3.789
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (6)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (6)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX TITAN or HD 7970?+
GTX TITAN has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX TITAN offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX TITAN is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX TITAN is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX TITAN offers more overall performance, while GTX TITAN offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX TITAN is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX TITAN is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX TITAN leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX TITAN can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX TITAN is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX TITAN is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX TITAN is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX TITAN if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.