AMD
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 vs GeForce 210
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
210
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD 6450 GDDR5 and 210 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗HD 6450 GDDR5 outperforms 210 by ~26% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+26%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 (~10%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider HD 6450 GDDR5
- Higher catalog performance index
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: Not supported
Reasons to consider 210
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3931
100100
100100
1343
Graphics card ranking
Positions 227–232of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
152 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
57Better
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
OpenGL
USB Type-C
Thickness
Vulkan—
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Release date
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
Recommended PSU
Length
Memory bus
Architecture
Power connector
Transistor count
Memory bandwidthBetter
Die size
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process node
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
Compute API—
Launch price—
Upscaling
DisplayPort
HDMI
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares HD 6450 GDDR5 and 210 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
HD 6450 GDDR5210
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
198 FPS
154 FPS
1080p Ultra
139 FPS
108 FPS
1440p Ultra
75 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
27 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2HD 6450 GDDR5198 FPS210154 FPSHD 6450 GDDR5139 FPS210108 FPSHD 6450 GDDR575 FPS21058 FPSHD 6450 GDDR527 FPS21021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077HD 6450 GDDR5128 FPS210100 FPSHD 6450 GDDR5110 FPS21086 FPSHD 6450 GDDR554 FPS21042 FPSHD 6450 GDDR518 FPS21014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5HD 6450 GDDR5162 FPS210126 FPSHD 6450 GDDR5105 FPS21081 FPSHD 6450 GDDR567 FPS21052 FPSHD 6450 GDDR540 FPS21031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyHD 6450 GDDR5105 FPS21081 FPSHD 6450 GDDR587 FPS21068 FPSHD 6450 GDDR548 FPS21038 FPSHD 6450 GDDR518 FPS21014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100393123%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10033316%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10032346%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001343107%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100273629%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100283625%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10032346%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100243845%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100313512%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.010.1
Vulkan—Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute API—OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedTesla 2.0
Process node40 nm40 nm
Release date20112009
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified260 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified57 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified16
Base clock750 MHzBetter589 MHz
Boost clock750 MHzBetter589 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 2x16
LengthVaries by board168 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardSingle-slot
Recommended PSUVaries by board200 W
Power connectorNone (slot power)None
Display outputs and limits
HDMIBoard dependentBoard dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentDisplayPort
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitorsVaries by board3
Max resolutionVaries by board4096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM512 MB GDDR5Better1 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Memory bus64 bit64 bit
TFLOPS0.2Better0.039
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: HD 6450 GDDR5 or 210?+
HD 6450 GDDR5 has the higher overall gaming score, while HD 6450 GDDR5 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
210 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
210 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
HD 6450 GDDR5 offers more overall performance, while HD 6450 GDDR5 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
210 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
HD 6450 GDDR5 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
HD 6450 GDDR5 leads in combined 1440p performance. HD 6450 GDDR5 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
HD 6450 GDDR5 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
HD 6450 GDDR5 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
HD 6450 GDDR5 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to HD 6450 GDDR5 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.