AMD
Radeon HD 6570 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 6800 XT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD 6570 and RX 6800 XT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 6800 XT outperforms HD 6570 by ~77% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+77%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon HD 6570 (~2%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider HD 6570
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Reasons to consider RX 6800 XT
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3155
10061
10050
4388
Graphics card ranking
Positions 58–63of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6800 XT
150 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon HD 6570
Price $19.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31
55Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
46Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
44Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
61
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
51
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
Device class
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Release date
Memory type
Power connector
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Vulkan
Upscaling
DisplayPort
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares HD 6570 and RX 6800 XT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
HD 6570RX 6800 XT
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
155 FPS
228 FPS
1080p Ultra
109 FPS
161 FPS
1440p Ultra
59 FPS
125 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
62 FPS
Counter-Strike 2HD 6570155 FPSRX 6800 XT228 FPSHD 6570109 FPSRX 6800 XT161 FPSHD 657059 FPSRX 6800 XT125 FPSHD 657021 FPSRX 6800 XT62 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077HD 6570100 FPSRX 6800 XT147 FPSHD 657086 FPSRX 6800 XT127 FPSHD 657043 FPSRX 6800 XT90 FPSHD 657014 FPSRX 6800 XT42 FPS
Forza Horizon 5HD 6570126 FPSRX 6800 XT186 FPSHD 657082 FPSRX 6800 XT120 FPSHD 657053 FPSRX 6800 XT112 FPSHD 657031 FPSRX 6800 XT91 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyHD 657082 FPSRX 6800 XT120 FPSHD 657068 FPSRX 6800 XT101 FPSHD 657038 FPSRX 6800 XT81 FPSHD 657014 FPSRX 6800 XT42 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100315556%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100316368%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100346461%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100438869%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001006148%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100367064%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100366862%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100346461%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100387363%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100356560%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.012.2
VulkanNot supported1.4
OpenGL4.44.6
UpscalingNot supportedFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 1.2OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTeraScale 2RDNA 2.0
Process node40 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20112020
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count716 million26800 millionBetter
Die size118 mm²Better520 mm²
Shader units / cores4804608Better
Base clock650 MHz1825 MHzBetter
Boost clock650 MHz2250 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x16
Length168 mmBetter267 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU250 WBetter700 W
Power connectorNone8+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.3aHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortBoard dependentDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoYes
Max monitors34
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM1 GB GDDR316 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.62420.74Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (5)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: HD 6570 or RX 6800 XT?+
HD 6570 has the higher overall gaming score, while HD 6570 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
HD 6570 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
HD 6570 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
HD 6570 offers more overall performance, while HD 6570 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
HD 6570 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
HD 6570 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
HD 6570 leads in combined 1440p performance. HD 6570 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
HD 6570 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
HD 6570 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
HD 6570 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to HD 6570 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.