AMD
Radeon HD 6670 vs Intel Arc A350M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Intel Arc A350M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD 6670 and Intel Arc A350M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Intel Arc A350M outperforms HD 6670 by ~6% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+6%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon HD 6670 (~18%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider HD 6670
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Intel Arc A350M
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
IntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3133
100100
10055
4360
Graphics card ranking
Positions 150–155of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A350M
138 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31
33Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
30Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
28Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
44
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
Device class
USB Type-C
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Interface
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Transistor countBetter
Vulkan
Upscaling
DisplayPort
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares HD 6670 and Intel Arc A350M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
HD 6670Intel Arc A350M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
155 FPS
164 FPS
1080p Ultra
109 FPS
116 FPS
1440p Ultra
59 FPS
62 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
22 FPS
Counter-Strike 2HD 6670155 FPSIntel Arc A350M164 FPSHD 6670109 FPSIntel Arc A350M116 FPSHD 667059 FPSIntel Arc A350M62 FPSHD 667021 FPSIntel Arc A350M22 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077HD 6670100 FPSIntel Arc A350M106 FPSHD 667086 FPSIntel Arc A350M91 FPSHD 667043 FPSIntel Arc A350M45 FPSHD 667014 FPSIntel Arc A350M15 FPS
Forza Horizon 5HD 6670126 FPSIntel Arc A350M134 FPSHD 667082 FPSIntel Arc A350M87 FPSHD 667053 FPSIntel Arc A350M56 FPSHD 667031 FPSIntel Arc A350M33 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyHD 667082 FPSIntel Arc A350M87 FPSHD 667068 FPSIntel Arc A350M72 FPSHD 667038 FPSIntel Arc A350M40 FPSHD 667014 FPSIntel Arc A350M15 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10031336%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100324329%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100344119%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100436033%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100364522%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100364420%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100344119%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100384823%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100354116%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.012.2
VulkanNot supported1.4
OpenGL4.44.6
UpscalingNot supportedXeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 1.2OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTeraScale 2Xe HPG (Alchemist)
Process node40 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20112022
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count716 million7200 millionBetter
Die size118 mm²Better157 mm²
Shader units / cores480768Better
Base clock800 MHz1150 MHzBetter
Boost clock800 MHz2200 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessSingle-slotIGP
Recommended PSU250 WOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.3aOEM dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors3OEM dependent
Max resolution2560 × 1600Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR34 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS0.7683.379Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: HD 6670 or Intel Arc A350M?+
HD 6670 has the higher overall gaming score, while HD 6670 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
HD 6670 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
HD 6670 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
HD 6670 offers more overall performance, while HD 6670 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
HD 6670 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
HD 6670 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
HD 6670 leads in combined 1440p performance. HD 6670 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
HD 6670 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Intel Arc A350M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Intel Arc A350M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to HD 6670 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.