AMD
Radeon HD 6930 vs GeForce GTX 970M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 970M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD 6930 and GeForce GTX 970M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗HD 6930 outperforms GeForce GTX 970M by ~1% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+1%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon HD 6930 (~25%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider HD 6930
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 970M
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3333
10065
5660
Graphics card ranking
Positions 310–315of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon HD 6930
69 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
33
33
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
30
30
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
28
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
59Better
29
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
45Better
36
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
USB Type-C
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumption—
Max monitors
Max resolution
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Vulkan
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumption—
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares HD 6930 and GeForce GTX 970M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
HD 6930GeForce GTX 970M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
167 FPS
165 FPS
1080p Ultra
114 FPS
114 FPS
1440p Ultra
63 FPS
67 FPS
4K Ultra
23 FPS
22 FPS
Counter-Strike 2HD 6930167 FPSGeForce GTX 970M165 FPSHD 6930114 FPSGeForce GTX 970M114 FPSHD 693063 FPSGeForce GTX 970M67 FPSHD 693023 FPSGeForce GTX 970M22 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077HD 6930108 FPSGeForce GTX 970M107 FPSHD 693090 FPSGeForce GTX 970M90 FPSHD 693046 FPSGeForce GTX 970M49 FPSHD 693016 FPSGeForce GTX 970M15 FPS
Forza Horizon 5HD 6930136 FPSGeForce GTX 970M135 FPSHD 693085 FPSGeForce GTX 970M85 FPSHD 693057 FPSGeForce GTX 970M61 FPSHD 693034 FPSGeForce GTX 970M32 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyHD 693088 FPSGeForce GTX 970M87 FPSHD 693071 FPSGeForce GTX 970M71 FPSHD 693041 FPSGeForce GTX 970M44 FPSHD 693016 FPSGeForce GTX 970M15 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10033330%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10035376%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10039415%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10056607%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100590200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10043455%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10042445%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10039415%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10045486%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10040412%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.012.1
VulkanNot supported1.4
OpenGL4.44.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.2OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTeraScale 3Maxwell
Process node40 nm28 nmBetter
Release date20112014
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count2640 million5200 millionBetter
Die size389 mm²Better398 mm²
Shader units / cores12801280
Base clock750 MHz924 MHzBetter
Boost clock750 MHz1038 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length220 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotMXM Module
Recommended PSU450 WOEM dependent
Power connector6+6 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.4aOEM dependent
DisplayPortmini-DisplayPort 1.2OEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors5OEM dependent
Max resolution4096 × 2160Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM1 GB GDDR56 GB GDDR5Better
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus256 bitBetter192 bit
TFLOPS1.922.657Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: HD 6930 or GeForce GTX 970M?+
HD 6930 has the higher overall gaming score, while HD 6930 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce GTX 970M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce GTX 970M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
HD 6930 offers more overall performance, while HD 6930 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce GTX 970M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
HD 6930 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
HD 6930 leads in combined 1440p performance. HD 6930 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
HD 6930 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
HD 6930 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
HD 6930 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to HD 6930 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.