AMD
Radeon HD 7750 vs Radeon HD 6930
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
HD 6930
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD 7750 and HD 6930 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗HD 6930 outperforms HD 7750 by ~6% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+6%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon HD 7750 (~9%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider HD 7750
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Reasons to consider HD 6930
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3133
10059
86100
5656
Graphics card ranking
Positions 152–157of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon HD 7750
180 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31
33Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
30Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
28Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
59
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
49Better
45
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
Max monitors
Max resolution
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Thickness
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
ArchitectureBetter
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
LengthBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares HD 7750 and HD 6930 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
HD 7750HD 6930
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
159 FPS
167 FPS
1080p Ultra
110 FPS
114 FPS
1440p Ultra
61 FPS
63 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
23 FPS
Counter-Strike 2HD 7750159 FPSHD 6930167 FPSHD 7750110 FPSHD 6930114 FPSHD 775061 FPSHD 693063 FPSHD 775021 FPSHD 693023 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077HD 7750103 FPSHD 6930108 FPSHD 775087 FPSHD 693090 FPSHD 775044 FPSHD 693046 FPSHD 775014 FPSHD 693016 FPS
Forza Horizon 5HD 7750130 FPSHD 6930136 FPSHD 775083 FPSHD 693085 FPSHD 775055 FPSHD 693057 FPSHD 775031 FPSHD 693034 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyHD 775084 FPSHD 693088 FPSHD 775069 FPSHD 693071 FPSHD 775039 FPSHD 693041 FPSHD 775015 FPSHD 693016 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10031336%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10034353%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10038393%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10056560%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001005952%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10042432%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10041422%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10038393%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10045450%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10038405%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.111.0
Vulkan1.2Not supported
OpenGL4.64.4
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.2OpenCL 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureGCN 1.0TeraScale 3Better
Process node28 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20122011
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count1500 million2640 millionBetter
Die size123 mm²Better389 mm²
Shader units / cores5121280Better
Base clock800 MHzBetter750 MHz
Boost clock800 MHzBetter750 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 2x16
Length168 mmBetter220 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU250 WBetter450 W
Power connectorNone6+6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.4aHDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.2mini-DisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors35
Max resolution4096 × 21604096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM1 GB GDDR51 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.8191.92Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (5)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: HD 7750 or HD 6930?+
HD 7750 has the higher overall gaming score, while HD 6930 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
HD 7750 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
HD 7750 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
HD 7750 offers more overall performance, while HD 7750 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
HD 7750 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
HD 6930 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
HD 7750 leads in combined 1440p performance. HD 7750 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
HD 7750 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
HD 7750 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
HD 7750 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to HD 7750 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.