Intel
Intel Arc 130V vs Radeon HD 6990
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
HD 6990
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Intel Arc 130V and HD 6990 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Intel Arc 130V outperforms HD 6990 by ~15% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+15%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Arc 130V (~3%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Intel Arc 130V
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Reasons to consider HD 6990
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
3833
65100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 116–121of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc 130V
170 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
38Better
33
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34Better
30
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
33Better
29
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
40Better
39
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
Power consumption—
ArchitectureBetter
Memory type
Launch price—
Clock speed—
Memory frequency—
Memory bandwidth—
Power consumption—
Process node—
Release date
Device class
Thickness
Base clock
Boost clock
Interface
Power connector
VRAM
Memory bus
TFLOPS
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Intel Arc 130V and HD 6990 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Intel Arc 130VHD 6990
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
157 FPS
169 FPS
1080p Ultra
111 FPS
116 FPS
1440p Ultra
86 FPS
63 FPS
4K Ultra
43 FPS
23 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Intel Arc 130V157 FPSHD 6990169 FPSIntel Arc 130V111 FPSHD 6990116 FPSIntel Arc 130V86 FPSHD 699063 FPSIntel Arc 130V43 FPSHD 699023 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Intel Arc 130V102 FPSHD 6990109 FPSIntel Arc 130V88 FPSHD 699091 FPSIntel Arc 130V62 FPSHD 699046 FPSIntel Arc 130V29 FPSHD 699016 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Intel Arc 130V128 FPSHD 6990138 FPSIntel Arc 130V83 FPSHD 699087 FPSIntel Arc 130V77 FPSHD 699057 FPSIntel Arc 130V63 FPSHD 699034 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyIntel Arc 130V83 FPSHD 699089 FPSIntel Arc 130V69 FPSHD 699073 FPSIntel Arc 130V56 FPSHD 699041 FPSIntel Arc 130V29 FPSHD 699016 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100383314%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10038365%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10038393%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100056200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100029200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100384312%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100384210%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10038393%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100384517%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10038405%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.211.0
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.64.4
UpscalingXeSSNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureXe2 LPGTeraScale 3Better
Process node—40 nm
Release date20242011
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified2640 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified389 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified1536
Base clockOEM/TGP dependent830 MHz
Boost clockOEM/TGP dependent880 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfaceOEM platform dependentPCIe 2x16
LengthOEM dependent310 mm
ThicknessOEM dependentDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent750 W
Power connectorIntegrated laptop power8+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentBoard dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentmini-DisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependent5
Max resolutionOEM dependent4096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAMOEM configuration dependent4 GB GDDR5
Memory typeShared LPDDR5XGDDR5
Memory busOEM configuration dependent256x2 bit
TFLOPSOEM/TGP dependent2.55
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 63
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Intel Arc 130V or HD 6990?+
Intel Arc 130V has the higher overall gaming score, while HD 6990 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Intel Arc 130V is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Intel Arc 130V is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Intel Arc 130V offers more overall performance, while Intel Arc 130V offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Intel Arc 130V is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
HD 6990 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Intel Arc 130V leads in combined 1440p performance. Intel Arc 130V can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Intel Arc 130V is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
HD 6990 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
HD 6990 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Intel Arc 130V if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.