Intel
Intel Arc A370M vs GeForce MX330
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce MX330
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Intel Arc A370M and GeForce MX330 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Intel Arc A370M outperforms GeForce MX330 by ~6% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+6%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Arc A370M (~2%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Intel Arc A370M
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Reasons to consider GeForce MX330
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3331
100100
5554
6056
Graphics card ranking
Positions 83–88of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A370M
126 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
33Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
30Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
28Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
44Better
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Memory cacheBetter
Thickness
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Release date
Upscaling
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Die sizeBetter
Clock speedBetter
Transistor countBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Device class
Power connector
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Intel Arc A370M and GeForce MX330 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Intel Arc A370MGeForce MX330
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
166 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
116 FPS
110 FPS
1440p Ultra
63 FPS
59 FPS
4K Ultra
22 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Intel Arc A370M166 FPSGeForce MX330157 FPSIntel Arc A370M116 FPSGeForce MX330110 FPSIntel Arc A370M63 FPSGeForce MX33059 FPSIntel Arc A370M22 FPSGeForce MX33021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Intel Arc A370M107 FPSGeForce MX330101 FPSIntel Arc A370M92 FPSGeForce MX33087 FPSIntel Arc A370M45 FPSGeForce MX33043 FPSIntel Arc A370M15 FPSGeForce MX33014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Intel Arc A370M135 FPSGeForce MX330128 FPSIntel Arc A370M87 FPSGeForce MX33083 FPSIntel Arc A370M57 FPSGeForce MX33053 FPSIntel Arc A370M33 FPSGeForce MX33031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyIntel Arc A370M87 FPSGeForce MX33083 FPSIntel Arc A370M73 FPSGeForce MX33069 FPSIntel Arc A370M41 FPSGeForce MX33038 FPSIntel Arc A370M15 FPSGeForce MX33015 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10033316%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100423810%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10041388%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10060567%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10045427%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10044417%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10041388%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10048456%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10041388%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSNVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureXe HPG (Alchemist)Pascal / Turing / Ampere
Process node6 nmBetter14 nm
Release date20222020
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count7200 millionBetter1800 million
Die size157 mm²74 mm²Better
Shader units / cores1024Better384
Base clock1550 MHzBetter1531 MHz
Boost clock2050 MHzBetter1594 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x4
LengthOEM dependentOEM dependent
ThicknessIGPIGP
Recommended PSUOEM dependentOEM dependent
Power connectorIntegrated laptop powerNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentOEM dependent
Max monitorsOEM dependentOEM dependent
Max resolutionDepends on host systemDepends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM4 GB GDDR6Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5 / GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit64 bit
TFLOPS4.198Better1.224
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Intel Arc A370M or GeForce MX330?+
Intel Arc A370M has the higher overall gaming score, while Intel Arc A370M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce MX330 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce MX330 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Intel Arc A370M offers more overall performance, while Intel Arc A370M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce MX330 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Intel Arc A370M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Intel Arc A370M leads in combined 1440p performance. Intel Arc A370M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Intel Arc A370M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce MX330 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce MX330 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Intel Arc A370M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.