Intel
Intel Arc A730M vs Intel Arc 130T
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Arc 130T
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Intel Arc A730M and Arc 130T across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Arc 130T outperforms Intel Arc A730M by ~31% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+31%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Partially verifiedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Arc A730M (~4%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Intel Arc A730M
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Reasons to consider Arc 130T
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · Intel XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelPerformance
4863
Graphics card ranking
Positions 4–9of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A730M
56 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
48
63Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
41
52Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39
49Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
47
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
56Better
54
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Length
Release date
Upscaling
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Thickness
Die size
Memory cache
Clock speed
Base clock
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequency
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth
Power consumption
Process node
Transistor count
Device class
Power connector
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Intel Arc A730M and Arc 130T across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Intel Arc A730MArc 130T
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
207 FPS
—
1080p Ultra
145 FPS
—
1440p Ultra
113 FPS
—
4K Ultra
46 FPS
—
Counter-Strike 2Intel Arc A730M207 FPSArc 130T—Intel Arc A730M145 FPSArc 130T—Intel Arc A730M113 FPSArc 130T—Intel Arc A730M46 FPSArc 130T—
Cyberpunk 2077Intel Arc A730M134 FPSArc 130T—Intel Arc A730M115 FPSArc 130T—Intel Arc A730M82 FPSArc 130T—Intel Arc A730M31 FPSArc 130T—
Forza Horizon 5Intel Arc A730M168 FPSArc 130T—Intel Arc A730M109 FPSArc 130T—Intel Arc A730M102 FPSArc 130T—Intel Arc A730M68 FPSArc 130T—
Hogwarts LegacyIntel Arc A730M109 FPSArc 130T—Intel Arc A730M91 FPSArc 130T—Intel Arc A730M73 FPSArc 130T—Intel Arc A730M31 FPSArc 130T—
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100486327%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100566515%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100576310%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100800200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10062632%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10061633%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100576310%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10065633%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10058638%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.4Not publicly specified
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSIntel XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureXe HPG (Alchemist)Xe-LPG
Process node6 nmNot publicly specified
Release date2022Q1'25
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count21700 millionNot publicly specified
Die size406 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores3072Better7 Xe cores
Base clock1100 MHzNot publicly specified
Boost clock2050 MHzBetterUp to 2.2 GHz (depends on host processor)
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Integrated into processor package
LengthOEM dependentNot applicable (integrated GPU)
ThicknessIGPNot applicable (integrated GPU)
Recommended PSUOEM dependentSystem dependent
Power connectorIntegrated laptop powerNot applicable (integrated GPU)
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 2.1 FRL (OEM dependent)
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20 (OEM dependent)
USB Type-COEM dependentOEM dependent
Max monitorsOEM dependent4 (platform capability)
Max resolutionDepends on host system7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (DisplayPort)
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM12 GB GDDR6Shared system memory; OEM configurable
Memory typeGDDR6Shared DDR5 / LPDDR5X
Memory bus192 bitDepends on system memory configuration
TFLOPS12.6Not publicly specified
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 21 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (1)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (1)
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Intel Arc A730M or Arc 130T?+
Intel Arc A730M has the higher overall gaming score, while Intel Arc A730M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Intel Arc A730M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Intel Arc A730M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Intel Arc A730M offers more overall performance, while Intel Arc A730M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Intel Arc A730M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Intel Arc A730M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Intel Arc A730M leads in combined 1440p performance. Intel Arc A730M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Intel Arc A730M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Intel Arc A730M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Intel Arc A730M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Intel Arc A730M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.