Intel
Intel Arc A770M vs GeForce 9800 GT
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
9800 GT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Intel Arc A770M and 9800 GT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Intel Arc A770M outperforms 9800 GT by ~36% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+36%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Arc A770M (~4%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Intel Arc A770M
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Reasons to consider 9800 GT
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5339
100100
61100
8813
Graphics card ranking
Positions 1–6of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A770M
102 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
53Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
45Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
42Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
59Better
57
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Release date
Upscaling
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Transistor countBetter
Thickness
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Device class
Power connector
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Intel Arc A770M and 9800 GT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Intel Arc A770M9800 GT
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
218 FPS
195 FPS
1080p Ultra
153 FPS
137 FPS
1440p Ultra
119 FPS
77 FPS
4K Ultra
59 FPS
29 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Intel Arc A770M218 FPS9800 GT195 FPSIntel Arc A770M153 FPS9800 GT137 FPSIntel Arc A770M119 FPS9800 GT77 FPSIntel Arc A770M59 FPS9800 GT29 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Intel Arc A770M141 FPS9800 GT126 FPSIntel Arc A770M121 FPS9800 GT108 FPSIntel Arc A770M86 FPS9800 GT56 FPSIntel Arc A770M40 FPS9800 GT19 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Intel Arc A770M178 FPS9800 GT159 FPSIntel Arc A770M115 FPS9800 GT103 FPSIntel Arc A770M107 FPS9800 GT69 FPSIntel Arc A770M87 FPS9800 GT43 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyIntel Arc A770M115 FPS9800 GT103 FPSIntel Arc A770M96 FPS9800 GT86 FPSIntel Arc A770M77 FPS9800 GT50 FPSIntel Arc A770M40 FPS9800 GT20 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100533930%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100613262%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100633265%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008813149%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100692788%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100672882%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100633265%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1007224100%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100643169%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingXeSSNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureXe HPG (Alchemist)Tesla
Process node6 nmBetter65 nm
Release date20222008
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count21700 millionBetter754 million
Die size406 mm²324 mm²Better
Shader units / cores4096Better112
Base clock1650 MHzBetter600 MHz
Boost clock2050 MHzBetter600 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2x16
LengthOEM dependent229 mm
ThicknessIGPSingle-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent300 W
Power connectorIntegrated laptop power6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentBoard dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentBoard dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependent3
Max resolutionDepends on host system2560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR6512 MB GDDR3Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS16.79Better0.336
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Intel Arc A770M or 9800 GT?+
Intel Arc A770M has the higher overall gaming score, while 9800 GT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
9800 GT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
9800 GT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Intel Arc A770M offers more overall performance, while Intel Arc A770M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
9800 GT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
9800 GT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Intel Arc A770M leads in combined 1440p performance. Intel Arc A770M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Intel Arc A770M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
9800 GT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
9800 GT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Intel Arc A770M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.