Intel
Intel Arc A770M vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
RTX 2080 Ti
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Intel Arc A770M and RTX 2080 Ti across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Intel Arc A770M outperforms RTX 2080 Ti by ~4% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+4%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Equal catalog scores
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Intel Arc A770M
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Reasons to consider RTX 2080 Ti
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5 · DLSS 2
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5351
10068
61100
8877
Graphics card ranking
Positions 1–6of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A770M
102 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
53Better
51
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
45Better
43
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
42Better
41
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
68
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
59
59
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Release date
Upscaling
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Transistor countBetter
Thickness
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Device class
Power connector
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Intel Arc A770M and RTX 2080 Ti across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Intel Arc A770MRTX 2080 Ti
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
218 FPS
209 FPS
1080p Ultra
153 FPS
147 FPS
1440p Ultra
119 FPS
114 FPS
4K Ultra
59 FPS
56 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Intel Arc A770M218 FPSRTX 2080 Ti209 FPSIntel Arc A770M153 FPSRTX 2080 Ti147 FPSIntel Arc A770M119 FPSRTX 2080 Ti114 FPSIntel Arc A770M59 FPSRTX 2080 Ti56 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Intel Arc A770M141 FPSRTX 2080 Ti135 FPSIntel Arc A770M121 FPSRTX 2080 Ti116 FPSIntel Arc A770M86 FPSRTX 2080 Ti83 FPSIntel Arc A770M40 FPSRTX 2080 Ti37 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Intel Arc A770M178 FPSRTX 2080 Ti170 FPSIntel Arc A770M115 FPSRTX 2080 Ti110 FPSIntel Arc A770M107 FPSRTX 2080 Ti103 FPSIntel Arc A770M87 FPSRTX 2080 Ti82 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyIntel Arc A770M115 FPSRTX 2080 Ti110 FPSIntel Arc A770M96 FPSRTX 2080 Ti92 FPSIntel Arc A770M77 FPSRTX 2080 Ti74 FPSIntel Arc A770M40 FPSRTX 2080 Ti38 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10053514%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100615510%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10063588%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100887713%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001006838%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10069639%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10067619%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10063588%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100726510%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10064598%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSDLSS 2
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Architecture and release
ArchitectureXe HPG (Alchemist)Turing
Process node6 nmBetter12 nm
Release date20222018
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count21700 millionBetter18600 million
Die size406 mm²Better754 mm²
Shader units / cores40964352Better
Base clock1650 MHzBetter1350 MHz
Boost clock2050 MHzBetter1545 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3x16
LengthOEM dependent267 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent600 W
Power connectorIntegrated laptop power8+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 2.0
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-COEM dependentYes
Max monitorsOEM dependent5
Max resolutionDepends on host system7680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better11 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit352 bitBetter
TFLOPS16.79Better13.45
Other comparisons
RX 7650 GREAMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Intel Arc A770M or RTX 2080 Ti?+
Intel Arc A770M has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 2080 Ti offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 2080 Ti is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 2080 Ti is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Intel Arc A770M offers more overall performance, while Intel Arc A770M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 2080 Ti is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 2080 Ti is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Intel Arc A770M leads in combined 1440p performance. Intel Arc A770M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Intel Arc A770M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Intel Arc A770M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Intel Arc A770M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Intel Arc A770M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.