Intel
Intel Arc Pro B50 vs GeForce 610M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce 610M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc Pro B50 and GeForce 610M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Arc Pro B50 outperforms GeForce 610M by ~38% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+38%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Partially verifiedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Arc Pro B50 (~38%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Arc Pro B50
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 / oneAPI · Intel XeSS
Reasons to consider GeForce 610M
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
5430
100100
8843
Graphics card ranking
Positions 25–30of 30
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 610M
177 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
54Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
45Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
43Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Architecture
Process nodeBetter
Release date
VRAMBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
TFLOPSBetter
Boost clockBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Recommended PSU
Power connector
Max monitors
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Device class
Memory type
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Compute API
Upscaling
Max resolution
Length
Thickness
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-C
Transistor count
Die size
Base clock
Memory cache
Power consumption—
Launch price——
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc Pro B50 and GeForce 610M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc Pro B50GeForce 610M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
—
150 FPS
1080p Ultra
—
106 FPS
1440p Ultra
—
57 FPS
4K Ultra
—
20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Arc Pro B50—GeForce 610M150 FPSArc Pro B50—GeForce 610M106 FPSArc Pro B50—GeForce 610M57 FPSArc Pro B50—GeForce 610M20 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Arc Pro B50—GeForce 610M97 FPSArc Pro B50—GeForce 610M83 FPSArc Pro B50—GeForce 610M41 FPSArc Pro B50—GeForce 610M14 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Arc Pro B50—GeForce 610M122 FPSArc Pro B50—GeForce 610M79 FPSArc Pro B50—GeForce 610M51 FPSArc Pro B50—GeForce 610M30 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyArc Pro B50—GeForce 610M79 FPSArc Pro B50—GeForce 610M66 FPSArc Pro B50—GeForce 610M37 FPSArc Pro B50—GeForce 610M14 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100543057%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100643072%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100643461%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100884369%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100693663%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100683564%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100643461%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100733765%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100643461%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectXDirectX 12 Ultimate11.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGLUp to 4.64.6
UpscalingIntel XeSSNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0 / oneAPIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureXe2Kepler / Fermi
Process nodeTSMC N5Better40 nm
Release dateQ3'252011
Device classProfMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified292 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified79 mm²
Shader units / cores16 Xe cores48Better
Base clockNot publicly specified475 MHz
Boost clock2600 MHzBetter475 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCI Express 5.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length167.6 mm (Intel reference)OEM dependent
Thickness2 slots (Intel reference)IGP
Recommended PSU280 WOEM dependent
Power connectorNo Connector RequiredNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMINo native HDMI on Intel reference boardOEM dependent
DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 (Intel reference)OEM dependent
USB Type-CVaries by board manufacturerOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 x 4320@60HzOEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better1 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS10.65Better0.091
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 28 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (1)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (1)
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc Pro B50 or GeForce 610M?+
Arc Pro B50 has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce 610M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 610M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 610M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc Pro B50 offers more overall performance, while Arc Pro B50 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 610M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce 610M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc Pro B50 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc Pro B50 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc Pro B50 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 610M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 610M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc Pro B50 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.