Intel
Intel Arc Pro B65 vs Radeon R5 230
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
R5 230
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc Pro B65 and R5 230 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Arc Pro B65 outperforms R5 230 by ~17% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+17%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Partially verifiedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Arc Pro B65 (~17%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Arc Pro B65
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 / oneAPI · Intel XeSS
Reasons to consider R5 230
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
5931
98100
10043
Graphics card ranking
Positions 25–30of 30
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon R5 230
87 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
59Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
49Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
46Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
98
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61Better
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Architecture
Process nodeBetter
Release date
VRAMBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
TFLOPSBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Max monitors
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Device class
Memory type
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Compute API
Upscaling
Max resolution
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-C
Length
Thickness
Power connector
Transistor count
Die size
Base clock
Boost clock
Recommended PSU
Memory frequency
Memory cache
Power consumption—
Launch price—
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc Pro B65 and R5 230 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc Pro B65R5 230
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
—
155 FPS
1080p Ultra
—
109 FPS
1440p Ultra
—
58 FPS
4K Ultra
—
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Arc Pro B65—R5 230155 FPSArc Pro B65—R5 230109 FPSArc Pro B65—R5 23058 FPSArc Pro B65—R5 23021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Arc Pro B65—R5 230100 FPSArc Pro B65—R5 23086 FPSArc Pro B65—R5 23042 FPSArc Pro B65—R5 23014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Arc Pro B65—R5 230126 FPSArc Pro B65—R5 23082 FPSArc Pro B65—R5 23052 FPSArc Pro B65—R5 23031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyArc Pro B65—R5 23082 FPSArc Pro B65—R5 23068 FPSArc Pro B65—R5 23038 FPSArc Pro B65—R5 23014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100593162%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100663172%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100703469%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001004380%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100981002%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100773673%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100753670%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100703469%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100823873%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100713568%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectXDirectX 12 Ultimate11.0
Vulkan1.31.2
OpenGLUp to 4.64.4
UpscalingIntel XeSSNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0 / oneAPIOpenCL 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureXe2TeraScale 2
Process nodeTSMC N5Better40 nm
Release dateQ1'262014
Device classProfDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified370 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified67 mm²
Shader units / cores20 Xe cores160Better
Base clockNot publicly specified625 MHz
Boost clockNot publicly specified625 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCI Express 5.0 x16PCIe 2x16
LengthVaries by board manufacturer168 mm
ThicknessVaries by board manufacturerSingle-slot
Recommended PSUNot publicly specified200 W
Power connectorVaries by board manufacturerNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1; board dependentHDMI 1.3a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1; board dependentBoard dependent
USB Type-CVaries by board manufacturerNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 x 4320@120Hz2560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM32 GB GDDR6Better1 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS12.28Better0.2
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 22 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc Pro B65 or R5 230?+
Arc Pro B65 has the higher overall gaming score, while R5 230 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc Pro B65 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc Pro B65 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc Pro B65 offers more overall performance, while Arc Pro B65 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Arc Pro B65 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
R5 230 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc Pro B65 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc Pro B65 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc Pro B65 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
R5 230 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
R5 230 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc Pro B65 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.