Intel
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon HD 8690M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Radeon HD 8690M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon HD 8690M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics outperforms Radeon HD 8690M by ~10% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+10%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 15, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics (~30%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8690M
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3229
5564
5056
Graphics card ranking
Positions 119–124of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon HD 8690M
170 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32Better
29
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29Better
27
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27Better
25
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
26
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
43Better
33
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Vulkan
DirectX
Release date
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumption—
Architecture
Memory type
Upscaling
Length
Transistor count
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Thickness
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumption—
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Device class
Power connector
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon HD 8690M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Intel Iris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeon HD 8690M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
160 FPS
148 FPS
1080p Ultra
113 FPS
104 FPS
1440p Ultra
61 FPS
56 FPS
4K Ultra
22 FPS
20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics160 FPSRadeon HD 8690M148 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics113 FPSRadeon HD 8690M104 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics61 FPSRadeon HD 8690M56 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics22 FPSRadeon HD 8690M20 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics103 FPSRadeon HD 8690M96 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics89 FPSRadeon HD 8690M82 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics44 FPSRadeon HD 8690M40 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics15 FPSRadeon HD 8690M13 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics130 FPSRadeon HD 8690M121 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics84 FPSRadeon HD 8690M78 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics55 FPSRadeon HD 8690M50 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics32 FPSRadeon HD 8690M30 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics84 FPSRadeon HD 8690M78 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics71 FPSRadeon HD 8690M65 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics39 FPSRadeon HD 8690M36 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics15 FPSRadeon HD 8690M14 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100322910%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100383411%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10037363%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100505611%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10040412%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10039403%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10037363%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10042445%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10037370%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.111.1
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureXe LPGCN / TeraScale
Process node10 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20202013
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified690 million
Die size95 mm²56 mm²Better
Shader units / cores768Better320
Base clock300 MHz925 MHzBetter
Boost clock1650 MHzBetter975 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
LengthOEM dependentOEM dependent
ThicknessIGPOEM dependent
Recommended PSU200 WOEM dependent
Power connectorIntegrated laptop powerIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentOEM dependent
Max monitorsOEM dependentOEM dependent
Max resolutionDepends on host systemOEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM4 GB LPDDR4XBetter2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS2.534Better0.624
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 66
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics or Radeon HD 8690M?+
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics has the higher overall gaming score, while Radeon HD 8690M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics offers more overall performance, while Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Radeon HD 8690M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics leads in combined 1440p performance. Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.