Intel
Intel Iris Xe DG1 vs GeForce 810M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce 810M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Iris Xe DG1 and GeForce 810M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Iris Xe DG1 outperforms GeForce 810M by ~7% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+7%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Iris Xe DG1 (~24%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Iris Xe DG1
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Reasons to consider GeForce 810M
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.0 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3230
100100
10054
5043
Graphics card ranking
Positions 57–62of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Iris Xe DG1
170 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
HDMI
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
DisplayPort
Max monitors
Max resolution
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Release date
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Architecture
Transistor count
Die size
Launch price——
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Power connector
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Iris Xe DG1 and GeForce 810M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Iris Xe DG1GeForce 810M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
163 FPS
153 FPS
1080p Ultra
115 FPS
108 FPS
1440p Ultra
62 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
22 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Iris Xe DG1163 FPSGeForce 810M153 FPSIris Xe DG1115 FPSGeForce 810M108 FPSIris Xe DG162 FPSGeForce 810M58 FPSIris Xe DG122 FPSGeForce 810M21 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Iris Xe DG1105 FPSGeForce 810M99 FPSIris Xe DG191 FPSGeForce 810M85 FPSIris Xe DG145 FPSGeForce 810M42 FPSIris Xe DG115 FPSGeForce 810M14 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Iris Xe DG1133 FPSGeForce 810M125 FPSIris Xe DG186 FPSGeForce 810M81 FPSIris Xe DG156 FPSGeForce 810M52 FPSIris Xe DG133 FPSGeForce 810M31 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyIris Xe DG186 FPSGeForce 810M81 FPSIris Xe DG172 FPSGeForce 810M68 FPSIris Xe DG140 FPSGeForce 810M37 FPSIris Xe DG115 FPSGeForce 810M14 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10032306%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100383217%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10037348%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100504315%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100403611%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100393511%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10037348%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100423713%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10037348%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.211.0
Vulkan1.31.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedKepler / Maxwell
Process node10 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20222015
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified1270 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified118 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified384
Base clock900 MHzBetter835 MHz
Boost clock1650 MHzBetter950 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 3.0 x16
LengthOEM dependentOEM dependent
ThicknessOEM dependentMXM Module
Recommended PSUOEM dependentOEM dependent
Power connectorIntegrated laptop powerNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentOEM dependent
Max monitorsOEM dependentOEM dependent
Max resolutionOEM dependentDepends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM4 GB LPDDR4XBetter2 GB DDR3
Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS2.53Better0.73
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Iris Xe DG1 or GeForce 810M?+
Iris Xe DG1 has the higher overall gaming score, while Iris Xe DG1 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 810M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 810M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Iris Xe DG1 offers more overall performance, while Iris Xe DG1 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 810M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Iris Xe DG1 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Iris Xe DG1 leads in combined 1440p performance. Iris Xe DG1 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Iris Xe DG1 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Iris Xe DG1 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Iris Xe DG1 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Iris Xe DG1 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.