Intel
Intel Iris Xe DG1 vs Radeon R9 280
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
R9 280
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Iris Xe DG1 and R9 280 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗R9 280 outperforms Iris Xe DG1 by ~13% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+13%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Iris Xe DG1 (~11%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Iris Xe DG1
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Reasons to consider R9 280
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3236
10060
100100
5056
Graphics card ranking
Positions 57–62of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Iris Xe DG1
170 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon R9 280
Price $37.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32
36Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
32Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27
30Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
60
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
47
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
HDMI
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
DisplayPort
Max monitors
Max resolution
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Release date
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Architecture
Transistor count
Die size
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Power connector
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Iris Xe DG1 and R9 280 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Iris Xe DG1R9 280
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
163 FPS
179 FPS
1080p Ultra
115 FPS
126 FPS
1440p Ultra
62 FPS
72 FPS
4K Ultra
22 FPS
24 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Iris Xe DG1163 FPSR9 280179 FPSIris Xe DG1115 FPSR9 280126 FPSIris Xe DG162 FPSR9 28072 FPSIris Xe DG122 FPSR9 28024 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Iris Xe DG1105 FPSR9 280115 FPSIris Xe DG191 FPSR9 28099 FPSIris Xe DG145 FPSR9 28052 FPSIris Xe DG115 FPSR9 28016 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Iris Xe DG1133 FPSR9 280146 FPSIris Xe DG186 FPSR9 28094 FPSIris Xe DG156 FPSR9 28064 FPSIris Xe DG133 FPSR9 28036 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyIris Xe DG186 FPSR9 28094 FPSIris Xe DG172 FPSR9 28079 FPSIris Xe DG140 FPSR9 28046 FPSIris Xe DG115 FPSR9 28017 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100323612%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100374213%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100505611%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001006050%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100404512%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100394412%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100374213%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100424711%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100374213%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.211.1
Vulkan1.31.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedGCN 1.0
Process node10 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20222014
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified4313 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified352 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified1792
Base clock900 MHzBetter827 MHz
Boost clock1650 MHzBetter933 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 3x16
LengthOEM dependent275 mm
ThicknessOEM dependentDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent550 W
Power connectorIntegrated laptop power6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependent4
Max resolutionOEM dependent4096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM4 GB LPDDR4XBetter3 GB GDDR5
Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR5
Memory bus128 bit384 bitBetter
TFLOPS2.533.344Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Iris Xe DG1 or R9 280?+
Iris Xe DG1 has the higher overall gaming score, while Iris Xe DG1 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Iris Xe DG1 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Iris Xe DG1 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Iris Xe DG1 offers more overall performance, while Iris Xe DG1 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Iris Xe DG1 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Iris Xe DG1 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Iris Xe DG1 leads in combined 1440p performance. Iris Xe DG1 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Iris Xe DG1 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Iris Xe DG1 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Iris Xe DG1 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Iris Xe DG1 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.