AMD
Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx vs GeForce 210
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
210
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and 210 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx outperforms 210 by 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+42%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx vs GeForce 210: key takeaway
The comparison of Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and 210 shows a 42% advantage for Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx in gaming performance, while 210 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Price / performance
4431
100100
COMPARISON RESULT
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is the best overall choice
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx leads in combined game performance. Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx leads in the combined performance index
210 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 137–142of 319
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
110 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce 210
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
44Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
38Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
51
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58Better
57
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Launch price—$79
TFLOPS0.56Better0.039
Memory typeSMADDR3
Process node6 nmBetter40 nm
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort
HDMIHDMI 2.1Board dependent
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX12.210.1
Vulkan1.3Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.2
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
USB Type-CNoNo
Recommended PSUVaries by board200 W
LengthVaries by board168 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardSingle-slot
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedTesla 2.0
Transistor countNot publicly specified260 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified57 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified16
Memory cacheNot publicly specifiedL2 0.03 MB
Power consumption—31 W
VRAM- SMA1 GB DDR3
Memory frequency—1,2 GHz
Memory bandwidth—10 GB/s
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2x16
Power consumption—31 W
Release date20222009
Clock speed400 - 2200 MHz589 MHzBetter
Base clock400 MHz589 MHzBetter
Boost clock2200 MHzBetter589 MHz
Power connectorIntegrated (shared power)None
Memory busSystem memory interface64 bit
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and 210 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx210
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
22 FPSEstimated 66%
18 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
18 FPSEstimated 66%
16 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
14 FPSEstimated 66%
8 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
8 FPSEstimated 66%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: WukongNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx182 FPSEstimated 74%210154 FPSEstimated 72%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx128 FPSEstimated 74%210108 FPSEstimated 72%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx99 FPSEstimated 74%21058 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx49 FPSEstimated 74%21021 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx117 FPSEstimated 74%210100 FPSEstimated 72%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx101 FPSEstimated 74%21086 FPSEstimated 72%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx72 FPSEstimated 74%21042 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx33 FPSEstimated 74%21014 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx148 FPSEstimated 80%210126 FPSEstimated 78%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx96 FPSEstimated 74%21081 FPSEstimated 72%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx89 FPSEstimated 74%21052 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx72 FPSEstimated 74%21031 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx96 FPSEstimated 74%21081 FPSEstimated 72%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx80 FPSEstimated 74%21068 FPSEstimated 72%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx64 FPSEstimated 74%21038 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx34 FPSEstimated 74%21014 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100443135%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100493145%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100443426%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100043200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1000100200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100443620%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100443620%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100443426%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100443815%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100443523%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.210.1
Vulkan1.3Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.2
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedTesla 2.0
Process node6 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20222009
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor countNot publicly specified260 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified57 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified16
Base clock400 MHz589 MHzBetter
Boost clock2200 MHzBetter589 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2x16
LengthVaries by board168 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardSingle-slot
Recommended PSUVaries by board200 W
Power connectorIntegrated (shared power)None
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.1Board dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM- SMA1 GB DDR3
Memory typeSMADDR3
Memory busSystem memory interface64 bit
TFLOPS0.56Better0.039
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310IntelReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx or 210?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx has the higher overall gaming score, while Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
210 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
210 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers more overall performance, while Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
210 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx leads in combined 1440p performance. Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
210 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
210 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.