H2H

Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx vs Radeon RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled outperforms Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx by 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+27%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx vs Radeon RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled: key takeaway

The comparison of Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled shows a 27% advantage for RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled in gaming performance, while Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Price / performance
Performance
4456
Price / performance
10054
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is the best overall choice

Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx leads in combined game performance. Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE5%

Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$1,090

Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 234–239of 317
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
RX 6900 XT / Liquid Coolednot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled

154 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx

100/100 · Price $89

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
44
56Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
38
47Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36
44Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
51
53Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58Better
55
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled
Launch price
TFLOPS0.5623.04Better
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.31.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
Recommended PSUVaries by boardVaries by board
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
ThicknessVaries by boardVaries by board
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Transistor countNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Die sizeNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Shader units / coresNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Memory cacheNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Power consumption350 W
VRAM- SMA16 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency18,4 GHz
Memory bus256 bit
Memory bandwidth589 GB/s
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4x16
Power connector8+8 pin
Power consumption350 W
Release date20222021
Clock speed400 - 2200 MHz2050 - 2435 MHzBetter
Base clock400 MHz2050 MHzBetter
Boost clock2200 MHz2435 MHzBetter
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
22 FPSEstimated 66%
28 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
18 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
14 FPSEstimated 66%
18 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
8 FPSEstimated 66%
10 FPSEstimated 66%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled28 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled23 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled18 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled10 FPSEstimated 66%
Call of Duty: WarzoneNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled28 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled23 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled18 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled10 FPSEstimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx182 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled232 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx128 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled163 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx99 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled127 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx49 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled63 FPSEstimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx117 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled150 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx101 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled129 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx72 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled92 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx33 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled42 FPSEstimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx148 FPSEstimated 80%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled189 FPSEstimated 80%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx96 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled122 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx89 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled114 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx72 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled93 FPSEstimated 74%
God of War RagnarökNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled28 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled23 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled18 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled10 FPSEstimated 66%
Hogwarts LegacyNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx96 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled122 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx80 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled102 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx64 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled82 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx34 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled43 FPSEstimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled28 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled23 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled18 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled10 FPSEstimated 66%
Monster Hunter WildsNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled28 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled23 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled18 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled10 FPSEstimated 66%
StarfieldNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled28 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled23 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled18 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled10 FPSEstimated 66%
Average FPSNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx68 FPSRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled86 FPSNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx51 FPSRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled65 FPSNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx41 FPSRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled52 FPSNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx24 FPSRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled30 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxRX 6900 XT / Liquid CooledDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100445624%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100496528%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100446539%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100088200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100053200%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxRX 6900 XT / Liquid CooledDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100447046%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100446944%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100446539%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100447451%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100446640%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.31.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Release date20222021
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled
Transistor countNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Die sizeNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Shader units / coresNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Base clock400 MHz2050 MHzBetter
Boost clock2200 MHz2435 MHzBetter

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4x16
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
ThicknessVaries by boardVaries by board
Recommended PSUVaries by boardVaries by board
Power connector8+8 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled
VRAM- SMA16 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory bus256 bit
TFLOPS0.5623.04Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ANavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx58
Device BRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled55
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx or RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled?

Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx has the higher overall gaming score, while Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers more overall performance, while Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx leads in combined 1440p performance. Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.