NVIDIA
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
RTX 2060 SUPER
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro P6000 and RTX 2060 SUPER across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Quadro P6000 outperforms RTX 2060 SUPER by ~6% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+6%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (~6%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Quadro P6000
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL · No dedicated hardware upscaling (DLSS unsupported)
Reasons to consider RTX 2060 SUPER
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5 · DLSS 2
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5944
7984
2756
10068
Graphics card ranking
Positions 25–30of 30
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
NVIDIA Quadro P6000
161 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
59Better
44
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
49Better
38
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
46Better
36
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
79
84Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
49
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
Interface
Memory busBetter
Memory type
Architecture
Device class
Process nodeBetter
Release date
VRAMBetter
Power consumptionBetter
HDMI
Vulkan
Compute API
TFLOPSBetter
Boost clockBetter
LengthBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
USB Type-C
Max monitors
DirectX
OpenGL
Upscaling
Transistor countBetter
Die sizeBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Max resolution
Base clockBetter
Thickness
Power connector
Power consumption—
Launch price—
Clock speed—
Memory frequency—
Memory bandwidth—
Memory cache—
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Quadro P6000 and RTX 2060 SUPER across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Quadro P6000RTX 2060 SUPER
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
—
194 FPS
1080p Ultra
—
136 FPS
1440p Ultra
—
106 FPS
4K Ultra
—
39 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Quadro P6000—RTX 2060 SUPER194 FPSQuadro P6000—RTX 2060 SUPER136 FPSQuadro P6000—RTX 2060 SUPER106 FPSQuadro P6000—RTX 2060 SUPER39 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Quadro P6000—RTX 2060 SUPER125 FPSQuadro P6000—RTX 2060 SUPER108 FPSQuadro P6000—RTX 2060 SUPER77 FPSQuadro P6000—RTX 2060 SUPER26 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Quadro P6000—RTX 2060 SUPER158 FPSQuadro P6000—RTX 2060 SUPER102 FPSQuadro P6000—RTX 2060 SUPER95 FPSQuadro P6000—RTX 2060 SUPER58 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyQuadro P6000—RTX 2060 SUPER102 FPSQuadro P6000—RTX 2060 SUPER86 FPSQuadro P6000—RTX 2060 SUPER69 FPSQuadro P6000—RTX 2060 SUPER27 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100594429%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100654928%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100705131%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001006838%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 10079846%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100775533%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100755433%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100705131%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100825736%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100715133%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12 (feature level 12_1)12.2
VulkanVulkan 1.31.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNo dedicated hardware upscaling (DLSS unsupported)DLSS 2
Compute APICUDA / OpenCLOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePascalTuring
Process node16 nm12 nmBetter
Release date20162019
Device classProfDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count11.8 billionBetter10800 million
Die size471 mm²445 mm²Better
Shader units / cores3840 CUDA coresBetter2176
Base clock1506 MHzBetter1470 MHz
Boost clock1645 MHz1650 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3x16
Length267 mm229 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU600 W450 WBetter
Power connector1× 8-pin PCIe8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMI0 native (DisplayPort adapter supported)HDMI 2.0
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNot supportedYes
Max monitors4 simultaneous displays5
Max resolution7680×4320 at 30 Hz via DisplayPort 1.47680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM24 GBBetter8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Memory bus384-bitBetter256 bit
TFLOPS12.0Better7.181
Other comparisons
RX 6800AMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 0 / 64
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Quadro P6000 or RTX 2060 SUPER?+
Quadro P6000 has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 2060 SUPER offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Quadro P6000 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Quadro P6000 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Quadro P6000 offers more overall performance, while Quadro P6000 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Quadro P6000 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 2060 SUPER is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Quadro P6000 leads in combined 1440p performance. Quadro P6000 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Quadro P6000 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 2060 SUPER is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 2060 SUPER is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Quadro P6000 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.