NVIDIA
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs GeForce 840M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce 840M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 5000 Ada and GeForce 840M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 5000 Ada outperforms GeForce 840M by ~81% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+81%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation (~81%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 5000 Ada
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL
Reasons to consider GeForce 840M
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
8631
100100
3754
10043
Graphics card ranking
Positions 5–10of 30
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
108 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
86Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
68Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
66Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
78Better
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
VRAMBetter
DisplayPort
HDMI
Interface
Memory busBetter
Memory type
Architecture
Device class
Process nodeBetter
Release date
Power consumptionBetter
Vulkan
Compute API
TFLOPSBetter
USB Type-C—
DirectX—
OpenGL—
Power consumption—
Max resolution—
Max monitors—
Recommended PSU—
Length—
Launch price——
Shader units / cores—
Power connector—
Thickness—
Die size—
Memory cache—
Clock speed—
Base clock—
Boost clock—
Memory frequency—
Memory bandwidth—
Transistor count—
Upscaling—
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 5000 Ada and GeForce 840M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 5000 AdaGeForce 840M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
—
154 FPS
1080p Ultra
—
108 FPS
1440p Ultra
—
58 FPS
4K Ultra
—
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 5000 Ada—GeForce 840M154 FPSRTX 5000 Ada—GeForce 840M108 FPSRTX 5000 Ada—GeForce 840M58 FPSRTX 5000 Ada—GeForce 840M21 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 5000 Ada—GeForce 840M100 FPSRTX 5000 Ada—GeForce 840M86 FPSRTX 5000 Ada—GeForce 840M42 FPSRTX 5000 Ada—GeForce 840M14 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 5000 Ada—GeForce 840M126 FPSRTX 5000 Ada—GeForce 840M81 FPSRTX 5000 Ada—GeForce 840M52 FPSRTX 5000 Ada—GeForce 840M31 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 5000 Ada—GeForce 840M81 FPSRTX 5000 Ada—GeForce 840M68 FPSRTX 5000 Ada—GeForce 840M38 FPSRTX 5000 Ada—GeForce 840M14 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100863194%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100883489%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100903490%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001004380%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100923688%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100923688%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100903490%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100943885%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100903588%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX—11.0
VulkanVulkan 1.31.4
OpenGL—4.6
Upscaling—Not supported
Compute APICUDA / OpenCLOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureAda LovelaceKepler / Maxwell
Process node5 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20232014
Device classProfMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count—1020 million
Die size—77 mm²
Shader units / cores—384
Base clock—1029 MHz
Boost clock—1124 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length—OEM dependent
Thickness—IGP
Recommended PSU—OEM dependent
Power connector—None
Display outputs and limits
HDMINoOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-C—OEM dependent
Max monitors—OEM dependent
Max resolution—Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM32 GBBetter2 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR6 ECCGDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus256-bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS65.3Better0.863
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 0 / 48
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (1)
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 5000 Ada or GeForce 840M?+
RTX 5000 Ada has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce 840M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 5000 Ada is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 5000 Ada is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 5000 Ada offers more overall performance, while RTX 5000 Ada offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 5000 Ada is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce 840M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 5000 Ada leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 5000 Ada can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 5000 Ada is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 840M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 840M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 5000 Ada if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.